Answer:
A. No, because Ahmed is not a merchant.
Explanation:
Implied warranty of merchantability is a law in contract which states that when there is a transaction between a seller (the merchant), and a buyer, there is an unwritten guarantee from the seller, that the product meets up to the ordinary standards of care. This means that the goods must be fit to do what the merchant says it will do. Therefore, if the seller finds it defective, he could return it to the seller. and if the seller refuses to make a change, a legal case could be established. The merchant by law is a wholesaler or retailer, who sells goods in which he has expertise or special skills.
Ahmed in the question could be argued in court to not be a merchant of cars and as such, has no expertise with which he can make a guarantee for the car being sold to Carlos.
Answer:
4.18%
Explanation:
The formula for used for this calculation is given as
Future value = Present( Initial) value (1 + r)ⁿ
Where n = number of years of the investment = 13 years
Future value (Amount of the investment after 13 years)= $5,280
Present ( Initial) value (Amount of the investment before 13 years) = $3,100
r = rate of return
The formula for r is derived as:
r = (Future value/ Present (initial) value)¹/ⁿ- 1
r = ($5,280/$3,100)¹/¹³ - 1
r = 1.0418139573 - 1
r = 0.0418139573
r is always in percentage format
r = 0.0418139573 × 100
r= 4.18139573%
Approximately, the rate of return annually for 13 years = 4.18%
When a manager needs to make a decision using the ethical decision-making process and reaches the second stage, they check whether the decision violates the c. fundamental rights of any stakeholders
The ethical decision-making process involves making decisions that are consistent with the relevant ethical views of the company which it draws from the society it is based in.
The second stage of this process involves checking whether the ethics involved in a certain decision, would violate the fundamental rights of shareholders which include:
- The right to ownership
- The right to Dividends
- The rights to evaluate corporate decisions
- The right to voting power
This is to ensure that the shareholders are taken care of because the first duty of a manager is to their shareholders.
In conclusion, managers need to check whether a decision affects the fundamental rights of shareholders before they embark on it.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/8864856.</em>
<em />
The options for this question include:
a. utilitarian beliefs
b. the global commons
c. the fundamental rights of any stakeholders
d. home country values
Explanation:
Tourism has become one of the main income sources for many developing countries like Nepal. Nepal has great potential to become a top destination for tourists as the nation is famous for its snowcapped mountains, abundant flora and fauna, exciting trekking routes and rich cultural and religious diversity.
Answer: $100
Explanation:
Opportunity cost is the benefit that we forgo when another option is chosen thereby leaving out something else. Based on the information given, Ed's opportunity cost of going to the ball will be calculated as the addition of the income that's lost when he takes some time off from his work and the expenses that he incurs on the base ball game. This will be:
= ( 4 × $15) + $25 + $15
= $60 + $40
= $100
The opportunity cost is $100.
