Answer:
I would politely reach out to XYZ organization and let them know I won't be taking them on their offer
Explanation:
In this particular situation, there is no legal binding in this agreement to start work. There is no responsibility from me to XYZ corporation.
If this new offer excited me more than what XYZ corporation has offered, then I have to decide which company i would decide to do my internship with. So I would have to politely decline the offer from XYZ.
Answer:
The offeror may retract the offer at any time prior to acceptance.
Most likely the offeror was able to get a better deal somewhere else, which allows the offeror to retract the offer. However, if they had already made a deal, the offeror would have broken the deal, which may result in action.
~
Answer:
A. National-security argument
Explanation:
The National-security argument is also known as the National-defense argument. The argument proposes the imposition of high tariffs on locally manufactured goods so that the country would not be dependent on other countries for those goods in the event of war. For example, if a country is dependent on other counties for the production of food, then it would be in great danger in the advent of war. Tires that are also used to prepare weapons should be sourced within a country so that in the advent of war, the country would not be dependent on others.
This is the argument employed by the congresswoman who sought the imposition of a tariff on tires so that the United States would not be dependent on other foreign countries during a war.
<span>Well, your costs per title have decreased from:
$780/7 = $111.43
to:
$1080/12 = $90
That represents a decrease in costs of almost 20%.
Then. taking the change in titles processed per dollar of cost (the reciprocals of previous calculations), means that total productivity has increased by around 23.8%. Are you calculating labor productivity as including overhead? Because then the answer is 23.8%.</span>
