Answer:
The company will pay 43 + 24h dollars to hire both Jill and Kyle your welcome
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
2nd graph (in the attached pics)
Step-by-step explanation:
Graphically, the <em>x-intercepts of the graph of a quadratic function are its zeroes. </em>
There can be
- no zeroes (where graph doesn't cut the x-axis at all),
- 1 zero (where graph touches the x-axis at one point only), and
- 2 zeros (where the graph cuts the x-axis at 2 points)
Looking at the figures, the 2nd graph has no real zeroes, <em>because the graph doesn't cut the x-axis at all!</em>
<em />
So, the answer is the second graph.
<span>1.) Is 64 squared rational or irrational?
Ans: Rational
----------------
2.) Is -1.2 repeating decimal rational or irrational?
Every repeating decimal is rational.
Every non-repeating decimal is irrational.
All whole numbers are rational.
All fractions are rational.
nth roots of a^k are irrational unless k is a multiply of n.
Example: The cube root of 3^6 is rational but the cube root of 3^5 is not.
Cheers,
Stan H. </span>
Try to imagine this word problem, there is a wall and a ladder leaning against it, the space from the bottom of the ladder is labeled 6 and the length of the height the ladder reaches on the wall is 8. Imagine this as a right triangle now, where the length of the ladder is the hypotenuse and the length of the legs of the triangle is 6 and 8. Because we know this, we can use the Pythagorean theorem, a^2+b^2=c^2
We then plug in the values and you get 6^2+8^2=c^2
When you simplify, you get 36+64=c^2 which is c^2=100
When you solve for c, you get c=10 which would be the length of the ladder :)
