Its 20400
× 10
That equals 204,000. Hope I helped.
Answer:
A. (1, 0)
Reason:
When the first equation is graphed: y <u><</u> x + 1, the left side of the line is shaded and when the second equation is graphed: y <u><</u> x^2 -3x, the bottom is shaded.
The green section does not contain solutions. So D is automatically out.
The red section does not contain solutions as well. So C is automatically out.
For choice B, the point goes out of the shaded blue section, so that's out also.
As for choice A its in the blue shaded section, which makes that answer correct.
(when the two equations are within each other and combine a color, then whatever points is within the shaded part is the right answer)
Answer:
Yes, the test was conducted with a risk of a type I error.
Step-by-step explanation:
If we reject the null hypothesis, does this mean that we have proved it to be false beyond all doubt? Explain your answer.
Yes, for a null hypothesis to be rejected, it has being proven beyond all doubt that the null hypothesis will not work. the normal distribution has being used for the probability calculation.
if the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternative hypothesis is accepted, a type I error as occur.
In general terms:
‘a hypothesis has been rejected when it should have been accepted’. When this occurs, it is called a type I error.
H x r = T The number of hours Sean works is represented by (h), Sean gets paid (r) per hour. By multiplying the number of hours worked by the rate per hour you get the total amount Sean gets paid (T)
