Answer:
Whichever reasoning processes and research methods were used, the final conclusion is critical, determining success or failure. If an otherwise excellent experiment is summarized by a weak conclusion, the results will not be taken seriously.
Success or failure is not a measure of whether a hypothesis is accepted or refuted, because both results still advance scientific knowledge.
Failure lies in poor experimental design, or flaws in the reasoning processes, which invalidate the results. As long as the research process is robust and well designed, then the findings are sound, and the process of drawing conclusions begins.Whichever reasoning processes and research methods were used, the final conclusion is critical, determining success or failure. If an otherwise excellent experiment is summarized by a weak conclusion, the results will not be taken seriously.
Success or failure is not a measure of whether a hypothesis is accepted or refuted, because both results still advance scientific knowledge.
Failure lies in poor experimental design, or flaws in the reasoning processes, which invalidate the results. As long as the research process is robust and well designed, then the findings are sound, and the process of drawing conclusions begins.
little info
Step-by-step explanation:
hope this help
pick me as the brainliest
<span>2x2 + 2x2 + 2 - 2x2 = 4 + 4 +2 -4
= 4+2
= 6</span>
The sum of the geometric series is 195
Hello from MrBillDoesMath!
Answer: f(x) = (2/3)*x -3 -- which is not a provided answer..
Discussion:
We are given that y + 7 = (2/3) * (x + 6). Multiply out the right hand side:
y + 7 = (2/3) * x + (2/3) * 6 = (2/3) *x + 12/3
= (2/3)*x + 4
Subtract 7 from both sides:
y + 7 - 7 = (2/3)*x + 4 - 7
or
y = (2/3)*x -3
Thank you,
MrB
y + 7= 2/3(x+6)
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Prime factorization: 43 is prime. The exponent of prime number 43 is 1. Adding 1 to that exponent we get (1 + 1) = 2. Therefore 43 has exactly 2 factors.