1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marta_Voda [28]
3 years ago
11

What is the slope of the line? y+1=3(x-4)y+1=3(x−4)

Mathematics
2 answers:
leva [86]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:give up

Step-by-step explanation:

sergeinik [125]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

y+1=3(x+4)

it is of the form

y-y1=m(x-x1)

where m is the slope

so slope=3

You might be interested in
Roger has 120 peanuts. He saves 48 for himself. He divides the rest equally among 8 friends. He wants to find how many peanuts e
Akimi4 [234]

Answer:

A and E  MARK BRAINLIEST!

Step-by-step explanation:

Well lets look into this question carefully ,

You should first subtract 120- 48= 72

Then 72/ 8 = 9 so we can check all that apply equations we used

A and E

3 0
2 years ago
Which expression is the simplest form of -(4x + y)n + 2(x - 3y)
Marina86 [1]

Answer:

\boxed{\bold{-4nx-ny+2x-6y}}

Explanation:

Rewrite:

= \bold{-n\left(4x+y\right)+2\left(x-3y\right)}

Expand \bold{-n\left(4x+y\right): \ -4nx-ny}

= \bold{-4nx-ny+2\left(x-3y\right)}

Expand \bold{2\left(x-3y\right): \ 2x-6y}

= \bold{-4nx-ny+2x-6y}

Mordancy.

4 0
3 years ago
Here’s a graph of a linear function. Write the equation that describes that function. (Zoom in if blurry)
Andru [333]

Answer:

y = 1/3x - 1

Step-by-step explanation:

This is because the slope is rise over run. The slope is 1/3 and the y-intercept is -1

Hope this helps

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
ava,jayden,edwina,lexi,luis, and trina are helping clean up a hiking trail during the summer. The trail is 10 miles long. Edwina
viva [34]

Answer:

120 trees

Step-by-step explanation:

4x10=40

40x3=120

120 trees will be planted

3 0
3 years ago
Explain how the difference of a fraction or a rational number and its additive inverse is equal to zero.
Jobisdone [24]
This question is in reverse (in two ways): 

<span>1. The definition of an additive inverse of a number is precisely that which, when added to the number, will give a sum of zero. </span>

<span>The real problem, in certain fields, is usually to show that for all numbers in that field, there exists an additive inverse. </span>

<span>Therefore, if you tell me that you have a number, and its additive inverse, and you plan to add them together, then I can tell you in advance that the sum MUST be zero. </span>

<span>2. In your question, you use the word "difference", which does not work (unless the number is zero - 0 is an integer AND a rational number, and its additive inverse is -0 which is the same as 0 - the difference would be 0 - -0 = 0). </span>

<span>For example, given the number 3, and its additive inverse -3, if you add them, you get zero: </span>
<span>3 + (-3) = 0 </span>

<span>However, their "difference" will be 6 (or -6, depending which way you do the difference): </span>

<span>3 - (-3) = 6 </span>
<span>-3 - 3 = -6 </span>

<span>(because -3 is a number in the integers, then it has an additive inverse, also in the integers, of +3). </span>

<span>--- </span>

<span>A rational number is simply a number that can be expressed as the "ratio" of two integers. For example, the number 4/7 is the ratio of "four to seven". </span>

<span>It can be written as an endless decimal expansion </span>
<span>0.571428571428571428....(forever), but that does not change its nature, because it CAN be written as a ratio, it is "rational". </span>

<span>Integers are rational numbers as well (because you can always write 3/1, the ratio of 3 to 1, to express the integer we call "3") </span>

<span>The additive inverse of a rational number, written as a ratio, is found by simply flipping the sign of the numerator (top) </span>

<span>The additive inverse of 4/7 is -4/7 </span>

<span>and if you ADD those two numbers together, you get zero (as per the definition of "additive inverse") </span>

<span>(4/7) + (-4/7) = 0/7 = 0 </span>

<span>If you need to "prove" it, you begin by the existence of additive inverses in the integers. </span>
<span>ALL integers each have an additive inverse. </span>
<span>For example, the additive inverse of 4 is -4 </span>

<span>Next, show that this (in the integers) can be applied to the rationals in this manner: </span>

<span>(4/7) + (-4/7) = ? </span>
<span>common denominator, therefore you can factor out the denominator: </span>

<span>(4 + -4)/7 = ? </span>
<span>Inside the bracket is the sum of an integer with its additive inverse, therefore the sum is zero </span>
<span>(0)/7 = 0/7 = 0 </span>

<span>Since this is true for ALL integers, then it must also be true for ALL rational numbers.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Can someone help me solve?​
    7·1 answer
  • Shawn downloads movies at a base price of $2 per movie. If he downloads 5 movies, he will get a 25% discount. How much will Shaw
    6·1 answer
  • A motorboat can go 16 miles downstream on a river in 20 minutes. It takes 30 minutes for this boat to go back upstream the same
    15·1 answer
  • What is 24/53 and 10/21 compared
    14·2 answers
  • Please help asap!!!!!!!!!!!
    8·1 answer
  • Find the area of the triangle below.
    11·1 answer
  • 2/3x = 27 , help loll
    12·2 answers
  • Mrs. Dixon had 1/2 of a cherry pie leftover. She split the leftover pie evenly between her children, and each child got 1/6 of a
    11·2 answers
  • At a local amusement park, 70% of the rides are made for kids who are 48 inches and taller. If there are 80 rides in total, how
    5·1 answer
  • Given P(A) = 0.46, P(B) = 0.35 and P(B|A) = 0.45, find the value of
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!