1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Andrews [41]
2 years ago
5

How to prove provocation in Crimes​

Law
1 answer:
USPshnik [31]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Provocation is often a mitigating factor in sentencing. It rarely serves as a legal defense, meaning it does not stop the defendant from being guilty of the crime. It may however, lead to a lesser punishment. In some common law legal systems, provocation is a "partial defense" for murder charges, which can result in the offense being classified as the lesser offense of manslaughter, specifically voluntary manslaughter.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
You may not cross over solid double yellow lines unless __________.
Alex787 [66]
C. Is the correct answer
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If the president dies, or is removed from office the vice president will become president, knowing that a president can only ser
ycow [4]
Yes it is possible though it hasn’t happened it is possible the most a person can be president is 10 years.


Hope it helps
8 0
3 years ago
What is evidence-based criminology? How does the meaning of the word evidence in evidence-based criminology differ from the evid
Vesna [10]
Can you show me a picture of your work, or maybe use brainly’s quick answers
7 0
3 years ago
Why does the Lincoln Project think provoking President Trump is a good idea?
agasfer [191]

Answer:

because there not smart

Explanation:

trump is so far my best president im still free in my country so why prevent him from doing what he needs to do

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can someone give ma an argument from the Tinker v. Des moines court case.
Alinara [238K]

Answer:

In a 7-2 choice, the Supreme Court's larger part ruled that not one or the other understudies nor instructors “shed their sacred rights to opportunity of discourse or expression at the school building gate.” The Court took the position that school authorities seem not deny as it were on the doubt that the discourse might disturb the learning

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1. What ideas came from the Magna Carta?
    13·1 answer
  • Why did the second continental congress, when drafting the articles of confederation, create a weak central government?
    6·2 answers
  • Does an officer need to witness the crime to arrest an individual for a misdemeanor?
    14·2 answers
  • Jordan files for bankruptcy because he has debts of $1 million that he cannot pay. He would like to sign a document to assure hi
    8·2 answers
  • Okay but like free the menendez brothers no cap
    8·1 answer
  • Why might jurors struggle to reach a verdict? (Include 3 reasons)
    10·2 answers
  • In 2014 the number of homicides was what percent of the total number of crimes reported
    15·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP
    15·1 answer
  • You are taking an exam and you haven’t studied for it. Your teacher isn’t looking, so you could cheat and probably not get caugh
    10·2 answers
  • Congratulations! You were just informed that you are the new Police Chief in a rather large city where an officer-involved shoot
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!