I'll do the first one to get you started
So we have g(f(x)) which means that we start with g(x) and replace the 'x' with 'f(x)' to get g(f(x))
g(x) = ( x - 4 )/2
g(f(x)) = ( f(x) - 4)/2 .... replace every x with f(x)
g(f(x)) = (2x+4-4)/2 .... replace f(x) on the right side with 2x+4
g(f(x)) = (2x+0)/2
g(f(x)) = (2x)/2
g(f(x)) = 1x/1
g(f(x)) = 1x
g(f(x)) = x
Let me know if you need help with the other one.
Answer:
m-9
Step-by-step explanation:
12-9= 3
14-9= 5
18-9= 9
27-9= 18
Answer:
7 oranges
Step-by-step explanation: 3 oranges in a pound 0.20 cents per pound. 60 cents per pound add it up.
There is a positive, linear relationship between the correct and guessed calories. The guessed calories for 5 oz. of spaghetti with tomato sauce and the cream-filled snack cake are unusually high and do not appear to fit the overall pattern displayed for the other foods. The correlation is r = 0.825 . This agrees with the positive association observed in the plot; it is not closer to 1 because of the unusual guessed calories for spaghetti and cake. The fact that the guesses are all higher than the true calorie count does not influence the correlation. The correlation r would not change if every guess were 100 calories higher. The correlation r does not change if a constant is added to all values of a variable because the standardized values would be unchanged. The correlation without these two foods is r = 0.984 . The correlation is closer to 1 because the relationship is much stronger without these two foods.
Answer:
It is a same size scalene triangle as the original triangle.
Step-by-step explanation:
:)
