Members include Antigua and Barbuda, The Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Dominica, Grenada, Guyana, Haiti, Jamaica, Montserrat, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Suriname, and Trinidad and Tobago.
Answer:
The following are the components of an ideal society:
1. Universal Access to Human Essentials
2. Environmental Sustainability
3. Balance
4. Equity and fairness
5. Access to Other Desirable Items
6. Freedom and Liberty
Universal Access to Human Essentials
Each individual requires certain things to live: air, water, food, assurance from unforgiving climate (apparel and asylum), and security from hurt. In a decent society, everybody would have her essential human requirements met.
This appears to be rudimentary, however a few thinkers and legislators have contended that fantastic everybody's essential human requirements isn't basic. They contend that some more prominent ideals must be accomplished by permitting or compelling a few people to be down and out. They esteem these more noteworthy products more than general admittance to necessities.
Environmental Sustainability
People have developed for a very long time firmly connected to nature. We are adjusted to the world's current circumstance and can live very well in it. A decent society would work flawlessly with the common habitat, keeping up and supporting normal frameworks. We would live in consonance with any remaining species.
Explanation:
Since each individual has her own meaning of an ideal society, there can't be a solitary, general norm there are in any event the same number of definitions as there are individuals. Just in an autocracy would one be able to singularly choose what comprised the components of an ideal society and force this definition on others. Unquestionably, the vast majority would concur that having an individual direct to every other person isn't worthy in an ideal society.
Answer:
- If they really want to go together, Pat and Mark could make a one-week trip to the beach, and spend the second-week hiking in the mountains. They could also choose to go on separate trips, so each can spent the entire vacation in their desired destination. Or they could go together to one of those places and agree to let the other person choose the destination in a future trip.
- Given that it´s Pat´s money, She should be able to decide, and Mark can enjoy the result of whatever she chooses. Pat could accept Mark´s choice by making sure he brings something to the table, like being in charge of organizing the vacation, and make it to a place Pat really would like to go. They could also split the money and make a small trip as well as buying either the computer or the printer, but not both.
- Pat could try to change her behavior and use the opportunity to ask Mark to change something she dislikes about him. Or, they could just accept that Pat is just not an organized person, find something Mark is not good at as well. Let´s say, ironing his own clothes. They could agree that each of them will take charge of what the other person won´t do.
- It´s difficult to find a win-win resolution to this case because workers have a legal right to assemble and fight for fair wages. Management could concede on a lower raise as long as they can offer some other perks, like providing food for their employers.
Explanation:
Personally, win-win strategies help me understand that when resolving conflicts one must consider the other side´s needs and be willing to compromise. I usually become a little stubborn when in such a situation, focusing on how I´m right and others should accept that. Trying to come with win-win solutions will probably help me get better results and keep relationships healthy.
