Answer:
0 M.
Explanation:
Hello,
In this case, the undergoing reaction is:
![M(NO_3)_2+NaCN\leftrightarrow [M(CN)_4]^{-2}+NaNO_3](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=M%28NO_3%29_2%2BNaCN%5Cleftrightarrow%20%5BM%28CN%29_4%5D%5E%7B-2%7D%2BNaNO_3)
Nonetheless, it only matters the reaction forming the given complex:
![M^{+2}+4CN^-\leftrightarrow [M(CN)_4]^{-2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=M%5E%7B%2B2%7D%2B4CN%5E-%5Cleftrightarrow%20%5BM%28CN%29_4%5D%5E%7B-2%7D)
In such a way, the formation constant turns out:
![K_F=\frac{[[M(CN)_4]^{-2}]_{eq}}{[M^{+2}]_{eq}[CN^{-}]_{eq}^4}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K_F%3D%5Cfrac%7B%5B%5BM%28CN%29_4%5D%5E%7B-2%7D%5D_%7Beq%7D%7D%7B%5BM%5E%7B%2B2%7D%5D_%7Beq%7D%5BCN%5E%7B-%7D%5D_%7Beq%7D%5E4%7D)
Now, one could assume that the initial concentrations of the ions equals the original compounds concentrations:
![[M^{+2}]_0=0.150M;[CN^-]_0=0.820M](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BM%5E%7B%2B2%7D%5D_0%3D0.150M%3B%5BCN%5E-%5D_0%3D0.820M)
In such a way, we modify the formation constant in terms of the change
due to the reaction progress:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f359/3f35955b0d14c958f3d339d53af75934269bad7d" alt="K_F=\frac{x}{(0.150-x)(0.820-x)^4}=7.70x10^{16}"
Now, solving for
:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45530/455309820cefab4519b86e1b509ac109724c271a" alt="x_1=0.15M\\x_2=0.82M"
The feasible solution is 0.15M which will lead to an equilibrium concentration of M⁺² of 0M
![[M^{+2}]_{eq}=0.15M-0.15M=0M](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BM%5E%7B%2B2%7D%5D_%7Beq%7D%3D0.15M-0.15M%3D0M)
This fact has sense since the formation constant is very large.
Best regards.