Answer:
C. The Berlin Conference held in Germany
Explanation:
In the context of the Industrial Revolution, which was in full steam in Europe during the end of the 19th century, commodity and natural resource-rich Africa started to draw more and more of the world’s attention.
In the late 1800s, representatives from fourteen countries met in Berlin to discuss how to divvy up their competing claims on Africa and its resources. Motivated by their desire to avoid a power struggle amongst themselves, representatives at the Berlin Conference drew colonial boundaries in Africa and decided matters ranging from trade rights to control over major rivers without a single African representative present.
Although many Africans resisted the ensuing colonization of their region, Europeans moved quickly to exploit existing political divisions among the region’s kingdoms and leveraged a distinct advantage: guns. By 1914, European powers controlled almost 90 percent of the continent.
Hope this helps! :)
<em>Stay Cold, </em>
<em>Brook</em>
The Americans were not following Mexico's rule
Answer:
When using judicial restraint, a judge will usually defer to the decisions of the elected branches of government.
Explanation:
The theory by which the powers of the judges are restricted and limited to strike down the laws is said to be judicial restraint. Judicial activism is the opposite of judicial restraint. The unconstitutional laws are subjected to be stroked down by the judges. The judicial restraint curtails the power of the judges unless the laws are unconstitutional.
Answer:
Organizational assimilation
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described it can be said that the mentor's job was to help Calvin through process known as Organizational assimilation. This term refers to a process in which new individuals that become part of an organization are adopted into the organizational culture. Which is what Calvin's mentor's job is by showing Calvin what to do and how to do it, which encompasses what the organizational culture is.
Answer:
1. The fact that a times most people tends to be obviously unethical without any reasonable explanations to back up their inactivity.
2. I did not agree with the idea of generality in the question which obviously points out that everybody is unethical to some extent which might be false because even at the course of generality, there most be an exception.
Explanation:
To be unethical means to be unable to conform to the given standards or rules of an organization professionally.
