That's two different things it depends on:
-- surface area exposed to the air
AND
-- vapor already present in the surrounding air.
Here's what I have in mind for an experiment to show those two dependencies:
-- a closed box with a wall down the middle, separating it into two closed sections;
-- a little round hole in the east outer wall, another one in the west outer wall,
and another one in the wall between the sections;
So that if you wanted to, you could carefully stick a soda straw straight into one side,
through one section, through the wall, through the other section, and out the other wall.
-- a tiny fan that blows air through a tube into the hole in one outer wall.
<u>Experiment A:</u>
-- Pour 1 ounce of water into a narrow dish, with a small surface area.
-- Set the dish in the second section of the box ... the one the air passes through
just before it leaves the box.
-- Start the fan.
-- Count the amount of time it takes for the 1 ounce of water to completely evaporate.
=============================
-- Pour 1 ounce of water into a wide dish, with a large surface area.
-- Set the dish in the second section of the box ... the one the air passes through
just before it leaves the box.
-- Start the fan.
-- Count the amount of time it takes for the 1 ounce of water to completely evaporate.
=============================
<span><em>Show that the 1 ounce of water evaporated faster </em>
<em>when it had more surface area.</em></span>
============================================
============================================
<u>Experiment B:</u>
-- Again, pour 1 ounce of water into the wide dish with the large surface area.
-- Again, set the dish in the second half of the box ... the one the air passes
through just before it leaves the box.
-- This time, place another wide dish full of water in the <em>first section </em>of the box,
so that the air has to pass over it before it gets through the wall to the wide dish
in the second section. Now, the air that's evaporating water from the dish in the
second section already has vapor in it before it does the job.
-- Start the fan.
-- Count the amount of time it takes for the 1 ounce of water to completely evaporate.
==========================================
<em>Show that it took longer to evaporate when the air </em>
<em>blowing over it was already loaded with vapor.</em>
==========================================
Answer:
Explanation:
recall that power is energy carried out or work done per time
P=W/t
P=2*10^6*35
t=6*60=420S
W=Energy
E=2*10^6*35*360S
E=25200000000
Energy stored by water from rest is called potential energy. Since the water is falling from a height , we calculate potential energy as thus
E=M*g*h
Assume that the water intakes are effectively 175 m above the electric generators. How much water must pass through the generators to power 2 million 35-W Las Vegas light bulbs for 6.0 minutes?
M=mass of water
g=acceleration due to gravity 9.81m/s^2
h=height ,175m
25200000000=M*9.81*175
M=
M=1716.75kg
Answer:
The blue boat traveled 6.1 km farther west than the green boat
The green boat traveled 10.7 km farther south than the blue boat
Explanation:
The equation for linear uniform speed movement is
X(t) = X0 + v * t
Since we have two coordinates (X, Y) we use
X(t) = X0 + vx * t
Y(t) = Y0 + vy * t
The dock will be the origin of coordinates so X0 and Y0 will be zero. The X axis will be pointing west and the Y axis south.
The blue boat moves with a direction 24° south of west, so it will have speeds:
vxb = 104 * cos(24) = 95 km/h
vyb = 104 * sin(24) = 42.3 km/h
And the green boat:
vxg = 104 * cos(37.7) = 82.3 km/h
vyg = 104 * sin(37.7) = 63.6 km/h
After half hour the boats will have arrived at positions
Xb = 95 * 0.5 = 47.5 km
Yb = 42.3 * 0.5 = 21.1 km
And
Xg = 82.3 * 0.5 = 41.4 km
Yg = 63.6 * 0.5 = 31.8 km
The difference in positions of the boats
47.5 - 41.4 = 6.1 km
31.8 - 21.1 = 10.7 km
Answer:
As the planets are very small and dark in comparison with stars, it makes them very hard to be found from earth.
Explanation:
Astronomy, of course, has a solution for this. As astronomers can't observe planets directly, they decided to observe the stars and search for the effects that planets have on them.
There are many ways of observing the exoplanets: Radial Velocity, Transit Photometry, Microlensing, Astrometry, Direct Imaging, etc.
Before all of this, scientist had to find ways to prove their theories. Most of their time they have spent in giving the creative answers.
Science and creativity are very much connected when we speak about the development of science. Rationality and creativity always go together.
In order to create an idea that other people will consider useful, it is important to use creativity. As no one has the exact answer when it comes to science, the adventure is to research the unknown.
Answer:
The one of the major difference between the magnetic and electric field is that the electric field induces around the static charge particle which is either negative or positive, whereas the magnetic field produces around the poles (i.e., the north and south pole) of the magnet
Explanation:
