You've found an Internet article that supports your view of a research subject. The author seems to have excellent credentials,
and the article is very well written. However, the author seems to be using outdated information to support her claims, and you can't find other articles that corroborate her information. Which of the following statements best describes what your course of action should be and why? A. You should use the article as a reference. The author is obviously an expert in her field and the information doesn't need to be "nitpicked." B. You should use the article as a reference. The important thing is that you've found a source that will bolster your arguement. C. You should not use the article as a reference. The lack of corroboration and outdated information outweigh the author's credentials. D. You should not use the article as a reference. Information from the Internet isn't trustworthy.
1 answer:
You might be interested in
The answer choice should be A).
The answer is magazines because I'm pretty sure that it means something that is printed.
1. cause
2, cause
3. cause
4. effect
5. effect
Happy to help
Answer:
em -__- im dum
Explanation:
Answer:
Nice, if you are in the more urban parts then it's definitely rarer but now with the orders, it is safer for animals. I remember once I saw a hawk in Oakland so it was pretty cool.
Explanation:
