Answer:
Brutus shares thoughts and feelings about ceaser with the audience
Explanation:
Answer:
The inference that is best supported by the passage is: A. Prior to the "Click it or Ticket" law, motorist could not be stopped simply for not waring a seatbelt."
Explanation:
In the passage is very clear that in the new law motorist can be now pulled over and ticketed for not wearing seatbelts (later in the passage it implies that's the reason why lawyers and citizens' gorups are protesting), which implies that before the state legislature passed the law this was not a reason to be pulled over even though this is not stated in the passage, the entire text circles around the novelty of pulling over motorist for not wearing seatbelt, therefore the best option is A especially because that is the main idea of the text.
On appeal, the Supreme Court of Arizona held that Miranda's constitutional rights were not violated in obtaining the confession.
During a two-hour interrogation, Miranda confessed to the crimes. Lawyers would contend that Miranda had not been clearly informed of his rights to have a lawyer and against self-incrimination. Their appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court would forever change U.S. criminal procedure
Answer:
Answer C. (Companies may move production to other countries.)
Explanation: Think my Answer is wrong or don't trust it? Let me know!
In a free trade, domestic firms will face a competition from abroad and thus will be more incentives to cut the costs, and increase efficiency. And thus this trade involves the effective and effective use of more resources in the world.
Answer:
Realistic Thinking
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this scenario is displaying what is known as Realistic Thinking. This refers to analyzing situations by looking at all the aspects that can affect it before actually making a decision regarding it. This leads you to see the situation in a balanced and pragmatic way.
