Because of the behavior and activities the person caused for the person to have traumas which leads to new generations because of maybe learning from their experiences, etc.
Answer:
The domino effect.
Explanation:
The Domino effect is the theory that when one country falls to communism then more will soon follow, one by one. This is what got us into the Cold War and all conflicts surrounding it, including the Korean and Vietnam War.
Answer:
The correct answer is D. Based on the Supreme Court's ruling in Tinker v. Des Moines School District, the students would be allowed to wear T-shirts supporting a political candidate, as the T-shirts do not disrupt school activities.
Explanation:
The ruling in Tinker v. Des Moines stated that the combination of the First and Fourteen Amendments to the Constitution of the United States did not allow a public school to punish its students for the use of political symbols, since this was a type of indirect discourse protected by the First Amendment that did not obstruct the normal functioning of the school activity.
Applying the same precedent, the students must be authorized to wear the T-shirts, as they would not be affecting the normal school activity.
Landslide victories do not guarantee that Congress will be of the same party and therefore can prevent continued success by the President.
These presidents were reelected due to the trust Americans had in them to get the country through a tough time. FDR--Great Depression, LBJ--assassination of JFK, Nixon--Vietnam/activism, and Reagan--recession. However, Congress was not in their favor to continue the policies they had been using in their first terms. On that note, these were all 2nd term (LBJ was technically first election but had served two years already) elections where the president had gained the approval of the people.
All faced increased adversity as well after the landslide victory. FDR--recession and WWII begins, LBJ--entry into Vietnam, Nixon--Watergate, and Reagan--stock market crash.
Answer:
This is a difficult question to explain, and here is my opinion, they shouldn't.
Explanation:
Not allowing mobs to influence government actions, depends on how you define mobs. If they are peaceful protests, then they should be allowed to influence government action, for example, the civil rights movement.
A violent mob would be seen as a rebellion, at a certain extent, and shouldn't be allowed to influence government policies and decisions.
