Think the right answer is b.
The British had an empire to run. The way that they kept their economy healthy was through a system called mercantilism. Mercantilism was a popular economic philosophy in the 17th and 18th centuries. In this system, the British colonies were moneymakers for the mother country. The British put restrictions on how their colonies spent their money so that they could control their economies. They put limits on what goods the colonies could produce, whose ships they could use, and most importantly, with whom they could trade. The British even put taxes called duties on imported goods to discourage this practice. This pushed the colonists to buy only British goods, instead of goods from other European countries
I think I would live under a monarchy, one simple flow of power (kind of). One leader for a long time until their next kin reigns.
Art during renaissance was highly influenced by Greek and Roman culture. Moreover the idea of humanism was also taken up by Greek and Roman culture.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Renaissance was a time in the history of the countries in Europe which came in the eighteenth and the nineteenth century. This was the time when the people moved from traditional ways of living to the modern ways of living their lives.
The main religion during this time was Christianity and the ideals of Christianity therefore had a lot of impact and influence on the renaissance reforms.
The purpose behind trading off on subjection was the Northern states needed higher duties thus as a greater segment of the nation were given this, however, the Southern states additionally requested something. So the Framers keeping in mind the end goal to give the littler states more portrayal in the House was permitted to consider each slave a large portion of a man.
I agree that the trade-off disregarded crucial principals since you can't consider somebody just a large portion of a man and the Framers ought to have attempted to think of an approach to abrogate subjection.
