1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
egoroff_w [7]
3 years ago
6

When a NS (neutral stimulus - bell) is paired with a US (or UCS - unconditioned stimulus - food powder) causing a UR (or UCR - u

nconditioned response - salivation) over several trials, what does the NS become eventually?
Social Studies
1 answer:
Helen [10]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The NS eventually becomes a conditioned stimulus (CS).

Explanation:

In classical conditioning, a conditioned stimulus can be defined as a neutral stimulus that has become associated with an unconditioned stimulus and, eventually, begins to trigger a conditioned response. A classical example is ringing a bell (NS) at the same time you offer food (US) to a dog. The dog will salivate (UR) because of the food, not because of the bell. However, if you repeat this several times, eventually the sound of the bell will go from a neutral stimulus (NS) to a conditioned stimulus (CS). It will begin to trigger the now conditioned response of salivation (CR), even if there is no food.

You might be interested in
Jessica believes that she succeeds in high school because she works hard, earned a place on the basketball team because she prac
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:    An internal locus of control

Explanation:  According to Julian Rotter's theory, the effect that Jessica achieved was the result of her motivation to engage in certain behaviors that led to success. The expectation of success by people who are committed to a goal is the motivation for those people to succeed. Nevertheless, the internal locus of control refers to people who feel that their success or failure depends on themselves. Such people believe that they control their lives on their own, unlike those who attribute their successes or failures to others.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
They built Waston Brake, a series of mounds about 25 feet tall near the what river
valentina_108 [34]

this is the answer Ouachita River

only bad bxxtches would know <3

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do those who want to see the exclusionary rule abolished argue should be enough to deter police misconduct?
cupoosta [38]

<span>Apparently, the supporters of the exclusionary rule argue that the rule is the one effective deterrent against police misconduct because according to them, the rule must be preserved in order to guarantee that the constitutional rights are must be honored. Moreover, in contrast to those who want to see the exclusionary rule abolished argue that the treat of civil lawsuits should be enough to deter police misconduct because they believed that the rule costs are too much and it operates to precent juries from considering highly relevant evident in which it sometimes operated to allow the guilty to go free. </span>

4 0
3 years ago
Mika can eat 212121 hot dogs in 666 minutes. She wants to know how many minutes (m)(m)(, m, )it would take her to eat 353535 hot
den301095 [7]

Answer:

10 minutes

Explanation:

Mika can eat 21 hot dogs in 6 minutes and she wants to know how many minutes it will take her to eat 35 hot dogs.

This is a problem that can be used establishing a ratio. We know that she can eat 21 hot dogs in 6 minutes, therefore her ratio would be: \frac{21}{6}

Now if she wants to know how many minutes it will take her to eat 35 hot dogs we can establish another radio where x will be the number of minutes it will take her: \frac{35}{x}

Since the problem tells us that she can keep up the same pace when eating the 35 hot dogs, <u>we can make those two radios equal to one another and solve for x: </u>

\frac{21}{6} = \frac{35}{x}\\x=\frac{35(6)}{21} \\x= \frac{210}{21} \\x= 10

Thus, it will take her 10 minutes to eat 35 hot dogs.

5 0
3 years ago
Students who do well on college entrance exams generally do well in college. This helps establish that these exams have split-ha
kirill115 [55]

Answer:

Predictive validity.

Explanation:

A Predictive validity test is the test that is taken to predict the future performance of the applicant based on the scores in the test. The test is useful in predicting the future, as suggested by the name.

The tests that are taken before allowing a person in any organisation are often predictive. A pre-employment test is such example.

<u>In the given case, the entrance exams are also an example of predictive validity. It is because based on the scores scored by a student will help the university authorities about the performance of the student</u>.

So, the correct answer is predictive validity.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Gaga's mother and father are both professional singers, as are her two older sisters. Gaga is in college, enrolled in a music cu
    5·1 answer
  • What is equality and how does it work
    6·2 answers
  • This cartoon printed in 1760 was most likely a protest against
    7·1 answer
  • Distinguish between conflict avoidence, conflict confrontation and conflict resolution
    12·2 answers
  • What is the connection between pre Columbia. Societies and the valley Mexico
    10·1 answer
  • French philosopher jean jacques rousseau believed that the best form of government would be one that practiced
    10·2 answers
  • Explain how the terms reapportion and gerrymander are related
    5·1 answer
  • Tonya is a student and is interested in working for the government. Because of her limited experience, she is seeking an interns
    9·1 answer
  • Each of the following is a reason why savings should be stored in a bank EXCEPT:
    7·2 answers
  • How could this document help you argue for or against the Electoral College being abolished?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!