The correct answer is letter E.
Explanation: It is a set of political, social movements, ideologies and philosophies that have as their common goal: equitable rights and a human experience through female empowerment and the liberation of patriarchal standards based on gender norms.
It involves various movements, theories and philosophies that advocate for equality between men and women, as well as promoting women's rights and interests.
<h3>C
reating a method of capital punishment that would actually deter people from committing murder.</h3>
Explanation:
Numerous studies have shown that imposing capital punishment or harsh punishments does not actually deter people from committing crimes. Studies have shown that states imposing such punishments still have high criminal rate than those states that do not.
Televising executions would only create a lobby for more controversies and futile discussions on the morality of capital punishment. Human rights activists strongly disagree of commercializing such events on grounds of human moral rights. They also believe that a state does not have the right to execute an individual.
It is believed that capital punishments are imposed very rarely and only to those individuals who have committed heinous crimes. However, if we look into past incidences, the verdict has been used unfairly and partially. The power to impose such verdict also raises the question on the sovereign authority of a state by many critics. Critics argue that states should not have to right to determine the lives of the people.
Answer:
- 'The law is "narrowly tailored" to achieve the compelling purpose, and uses the "least restrictive means" to achieve the purpose.'
Explanation:
As per 'strict scrutiny analysis,' in order to illustrate that a specific government action is constitutionally accurate, the government requires to demonstrate that the law is closely adapted in order to attain the compelling purpose by employing 'fewer conditional sources' that helps in attaining the desired purpose. Basically, the government needs to prove that the action is necessary to achieve the goal.
If you are trying to strengthen political parties most just lie, belittle, name call, throw others under the bus, point fingers, blame it on someone else and everything else we are currently seeing the media.
I would prefer to get rid of political parties all together and start hearing what people actually stand for. There are no right or wrong for most things, only different views and opinions shaped by our lives and circumstances we experience. The people of the United States is who needs strengthening. Fighting and blaming need to cease. People need to learn to take responsibility for their actions. People need to feel empowered again and want to make a difference, not just follow along blindly. Most government systems needs a redo. They are old, broken and no longer fit the needs of today. America needs to get back to its roots and I am not speaking of religion. America was made great by trades (farming, steelworkers, oil workers, fishermen, lumber, mechanics, machinist, textile & etc) which we are losing at a fast rate. People need to respect each other and understand you can disagree and remain civil. People need to learn finances and budgets. Things are never free and there is always cost associated with it. I am not sure if I actually answered your question, but I don't think strengthening political parties is going to help anything only hurt more people and families.
