How to assess the behavior of consumers Facial expressions can be used to gauge eating habits and consumer preferences. shopping behavior analysis. investigating customer behavior in a natural setting. study of neuromarketing.
Many things about a person's thoughts can be deduced from their facial expressions. Humans are capable of expressing their feelings both verbally and physically. Our body language can occasionally be a dead giveaway to the true emotions we are experiencing. Unconsciously, our eyes, lips that tremble a little, nose that wrinkles, etc., all convey our hidden feelings.
By observing one's facial expressions, one can determine their emotional condition. Even as children, a teacher's severe gaze was all it took to get us to straighten up and obey. Our face is a reflection of our innermost emotions. A small percentage of people have extremely expressive faces that reveal their entire emotional state.
Learn more about facial expressions here
brainly.com/question/9022420
#SPJ9
Answer: In order to maximize utility, Ellie should buy more of Alpha and less of Beta
Explanation: Marginal utility is the quantity of added satisfaction that a consumer enjoyed from consuming additional units of goods or services. Marginal utility is the additional satisfaction or benefit (utility) that a consumer derives from buying an additional unit of a commodity or service. However, in determining how much of an item consumers are willing to purchase marginal utility is used.
Answer: are areas of high and low capability.
Explanation:
Strength and weakness are areas of high and low capability. Some examples of the strengths that an organization has include large market share, strong employee attitudes, economies of scale, hug integrity etc. These gives an organization an edge over its rivals.
The weakness of an organization makes such organization lag behind its rivals.
Answer:
Yes, any intentional misrepresentations by the applicant should be enough to permit the insurer to deny coverage for a loss even if the misrepresented fact had no relationship to the loss
Explanation:
This is because in case of any intentional misrepresentations the insurer gets a right of recession that is based upon fraud.
In this case the misrepresentation by Hamza voids the policy ab-initio (i.e. at its inception). This is because the misrepresentations by Hamza in this case were with regards to material facts related to the property and this misrepresentation may have induced the insurer to act and thus insure the property. Here the misrepresentations were that the property had a sprinkler system and always had a guard on duty. These two material misrepresentations led the insurer to make an incorrect risk assessment with regards to property and this incorrect and lower assessment of risk profile of the building led the insurer to provide insurance coverage.
Thus, we can conclude that even though the misrepresentations made by Hamza had no relationship to the loss but still the insurer can deny coverage in this case.
Answer:
I could not find the exact details required to solve this so I will use a similar question that you can reference;
The impact of dropping the Eastern division is;
= Consolidated operating income + Direct Fixed costs avoided - Contribution margin lost
= (-75,000 + 15,000) + 180,000 - ( 550,000 - 275,000)
= -60,000 + 180,000 - 275,000
= -$155,000
Loss of $155,000