The answer is The income effect.
Income effect is described as the change in demand of a service or good brought on by change in the income of a consumer.It is observed in two cases first is when income of person increases and second is when price of goods or service decreases.
The scenario given in the question is an example of second case as the price of burger was less than normal Steve perceived his income to be able to buy more product in same price
Answer:
Correct answer is (C)
Explanation:
At the beginning of the year.
Earnings per share (EPS) is the portion of profit earned by the company that is allocated to each outstanding share of its common stock. It is determined by taking the difference between a company's net income and dividends paid for preferred stock and then divided by the average number of shares outstanding. So if stock split occurred when calculating the current year EPS, the shares are treated as issued at the beginning of the year.
Answer:
C.105,500 units
Explanation:
Equivalent unit of production is the quantity of work done in the manufacturing / production department. It also includes the completed percentage portion of the units in work in process.
Units complete and transferred = Beginning units + Additions - uncompleted units = 10,000 units + 100,0000 units - 15,000 units = 95,000 units
Equivalent Units = Units complete and transferred + ( Closing units x percentage completion )
Equivalent Units = 95,000 + ( 15,000 x 70% )
Equivalent Units = 95,000 + 10,500
Equivalent Units = 105,500
C. Future value of a series of deposits
It is not B, because although Future Value of a Single Amount (FV) is similar, it is only when you deposit a certain amount one time and let it grow in value.
Your question says they deposit money more than once, so it is C.
Answer:
B. real-options perspective.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that this approach to strategic alliance is referred to as a real-options perspective. This perspective refers to the ability of an individual or company to have the freedom to choose between logical financial options in capital investments in order to try and make the best choices and decisions. Which is what Elegance Inc. did when they saw that the company they were supporting was most likely to fail due to their unforeseen problem.