809.65 that is the answer i think
Answer:
Where:
And we can find the intercept using this:
On this case the correct answer would be:
E. none of the above
Since the intercept has no association between the increase/decrease of the dependent variable respect to the independent variable
Step-by-step explanation:
Assuming the following options:
A. there is a positive correlation between X and Y
B. there is a negative correlation between X and Y
C. if X is increased, Y must also increase
D. if Y is increased, X must also increase
E. none of the above
If we want a model
where m represent the lope and b the intercept
Where:
And we can find the intercept using this:
On this case the correct answer would be:
E. none of the above
Since the intercept has no association between the increase/decrease of the dependent variable respect to the independent variable
The answer is B.
Negative numbers are to the far left if you were using a number line, so -1 to the 3rd power is -1. Everything else is positive. 1/4 is the same as 0.25 which is less than positive 1, positive 8.8 is next and the last would be -5 to the 2nd power which is 25.
Answer:
The earnings will double
Step-by-step explanation:
Step one:
given data
we are told that the sales person's earnings is 4% of the sales made.
given that the sales made is $37,000 worth of furnaces.
Step two:
we want to find 4% of $37,000
=4/100*37000
=0.04*37000
=1480
hence for $37,000 the earning will be $1480.
Now suppose sales is doubled that is 37000*2= 74000
we want to find 4% of $74,000
=4/100*74000
=0.04*74000
=2960.
the earnings is $2960.
So if sales doubles the earnings will double
Look at the axis graph. If both of the coordinates are negative, it would be in quadrant lll. If you go over to the x-axis, you would be in quadrant lV, or 4.
(-2,-3) -> (2,-3)
You change the x-factor's sign.
I hope this helps!
~kaikers