Answer:
Larger habitats support populations with higher carrying capacities. Higher quality habitats support populations with higher carrying capacities. There is no difference in population growth rate between large and small habitats. Some major threats to biodiversity are: Habitat destruction/Deforestation, Introduced and invasive species, Genetic pollution, Over exploitation, Hybridization, Climate change, Diseases, Human overpopulation. If abiotic or biotic factors change, the carrying capacity changes as well. Natural disasters can destroy resources in an ecosystem. If resources are destroyed, the ecosystem will not be able to support a large population. This causes the carrying capacity to decrease.
Carrying capacity could be reduced if each individual within the species consumed less from the environment. Think about humans: if every human needs a four car garage and a large house, the planet can sustain fewer humans than if each human lived in a studio apartment and traveled using a bicycle. It would take 1.75 Earths to sustain our current population. If current trends continue, we will reach 3 Earths by the year 2050. It is beyond dispute that the modern industrial world has been able to temporarily expand Earth's carrying capacity for our species. As Nordhaus points out, population has grown dramatically (from less than a billion in 1800 to 7.6 billion today), and so has per capita consumption. Historically, habitat and land use change have had the biggest impact on biodiversity in all ecosystems, but climate change and pollution are projected to increasingly affect all aspects of biodiversity. Sustainable agriculture practices support integrating biodiversity in various ways including in terms of diversity of crops, traditional agriculture techniques to control pests and increase productivity as well as ensuring that farmed land is made up of a diverse mix of grazing land, crop land, orchards, wetlands and more.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
1. Organ
2. Nucleus
3. Diffusion
Answer:
C
Explanation:
there would be a 1 out of 4 chance of the child to have albinism
B) parenchyma cells hope this was helpful!!!
Answer:
The options
A-The government has a heavy burden to prove harm.
B-The government can limit speech that causes harm.
C-The government has unlimited power to limit speech.
D-The government must follow the First Amendment
The CORRECT ANSWER IS B-
B-The government can limit speech that causes harm.
Explanation:
Though the outcomes of Schenck and New York Times differed, it pinpoints that Government can restrict speech of people or organizations whose intentions is to damage and cause more harm to it as an institution.
Take a look at the scenario of Schneck Vs. the United States for instance, where the decision was in the favor of the United State.
It judged that the defendants who shared out fliers to draft age men in order to notify them not to be involved in the induction, was purposely preventing or hindering the proper flow of the draft and judged it as a criminal offense. This shows enough evidence that the government possess the power to restrict speech if it's aftermath is going to cause more harm to it as an organisation.
