I think would be most susceptible to have mumps is the Patty. <span>
</span><span>If we review the conditions: Tina had mumps vaccine; her mother had mumps before; baby sister was breastfed, which is not a protection for mumps, and Patty wasn't vaccinated but was the one who had contact with the person who has mumps. Patty was the most vulnerable.</span>
<span>The main reasons for mumps are through situations where saliva was able to be passed. </span><span> Such situations were sneezing, coughing, food sharing, plate use, kissing, and touching the nose or mouth of people with mumps.</span>
Answer:
The result of Marlene hiring an attorney to obtain her return would only be successful if she did not voluntarily give up her right to ownership of the plates and can provide an evidence to that effect
Explanation:
The result of Marlene hiring an attorney to obtain her return would only be successful if M can produce an evidence showing that she did not intentionally dump the plates into the town dump ( i.e. she did not voluntarily give up her right to ownership of the plates ) If not the plates will be transferred to give to Joe under the code name " finders keepers "
The answer I think it is ,is (B.)
Answer:
B) 0.7; inelastic
Explanation:
The computation of the absolute value of the price elasticity of demand is shown below:
Elasticity is
= [(Sales - prior sales) ÷ ( Sales + prior sales) ÷ 2] ÷ [(price - dropped price) ÷ (price - dropped price) ÷ 2
= [(1,040,000 - 890,000) ÷ (1,040,000 + 890,000) ÷ 2] ÷ [(25,000 - 20,000) ÷ (25,000 + 20,000) ÷ 2]
= (150,000 ÷ 965,000) ÷ (5,000 ÷ 22,500)
= 0.15 ÷ 0.22
= 0.7
It is less than one so the demand is inelastic
Two taxes on employers, two taxes on employees, OASDI and HI taxes and taxes on the net earnings of the self-employed
