Answer:
1. C. No; as both the owner and operator of Daniel's Tantalizing Tees, Daniel has not created the necessary agency relationship through which an agency conflict can exist.
For an agency problem to exist, the owners and the managers must be two different sets of people. If they are the same person, then practically speaking, they cannot usurp their own wealth.
2. C. No; although an agency relationship exists between TGZ's management-including Li as TGZ's chairman and CEO and the firm's shareholders-there is no agency conflict, because no expropriation or wasting of the shareholders' wealth has occurred.
Indeed there is an Agency relationship in effect because some shareholders are not in management. However, it cannot be said that there is a agency conflict because there is no evidence shown that shareholder wealth is being expropriated.
3. <u>Intrinsic</u>
The Intrinsic value of a stock is the value that an investor believes the stock is worth. A Manager should therefore get incentives that will inspire them to take investor perception of stock high. When this happens it increases shareholder wealth primarily through capital gain.
4 ... direct shareholder intervention would be <u>more</u> likely to motivate the firm's management.
Institutional Investors such as Pension and Mutual funds usually have more say in a company as they represent several shareholders and have expertise in the field. Should they get involved, their direct intervention would motivate the firm's management.
5. More likely
If investors believe that the stock should be trading for higher than it actually is, this is incentive to try to lay their hands on the stock to take advantage of this undervaluation. They would be able to offer the current shareholders more money than what it is currently worth which will most likely get them the shares they want. This is classified as a Hostile takeover.
Answer:
correct option is B. understatement; $30,900
Explanation:
given data
normal weekly wage = $12,500
work = 5 day week
performed services = $40,900
solution
as here net income under cash basis will be nil
because here cash not receive till the July 8,
and here cash is paid to employee on July 1 which is Friday
so net income under an accrual basis for June month
and here revenue not yet received is $40,900
and salaries payable for last four days of June month will be as
salaries payable = 
salaries payable = $10000
so Net income as per accrual basis will be
Net income = $40,900 - $10000
Net income = $30,900
so here income under cash basis is understated
so correct option is B. understatement; $30,900
Answer:
$23,934.70
Explanation:
Perpetuity (P) Present Value = Deposit = $478,694
Perpetuity annuity value = Deposit * Interest rate
Perpetuity annuity value = $478,694 * 5%
Perpetuity annuity value = $23,934.70
Answer:
The correct answer is: 36 months or 3 years.
Explanation:
The Department of Treasury Circular 230 establishes the regulations for all those professionals who represent individuals before the Internal Revenue Service (<em>IRS</em>) such as <em>lawyers </em>and <em>accountants</em>. In section 10.29 there is a retention requirement in front of conflict of interest that implies waivers or consents to be retained by the tax professional for <em>3 years post-representation</em> and made available to the IRS if requested.
