1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SSSSS [86.1K]
2 years ago
10

On January 1, Year 1, Friedman Company purchased a truck that cost $33,000. The truck had an expected useful life of 100,000 mil

es over 8 years and an $7,000 salvage value. During Year 2, Friedman drove the truck 34,000 miles. The amount of depreciation expense recognized in Year 2 assuming that Friedman uses the units-of-production method is: (Do not round intermediate calculations.)
Business
2 answers:
Rainbow [258]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Depreciation expense-Year 2 = $8840

Explanation:

It is important to note that the depreciation is based on the units-of-production method and in case of the truck, we take 100000 miles as its useful life or total units of production.

The depreciable value of the truck is Cost - salvage value,

Depreciable Value = 33000 - 7000 = 26000

The depreciation for year 2 based on units-of-production is,

Depreciation expense for year 2 = 26000 * 34000/100000 = $8840

pashok25 [27]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

$8,840

Explanation:

The unit of production method can be described as a depreciation method that is used to depreciate the value of an asset based on the expected number of units the asset the asset will produce during its useful life. It can be calculated as follows:

Depreciation expense = (Equipment original cost – Salvage value) × (Unit per year ÷ Total expected units)

From the question, the units of production is expressed as the number of miles. Given this, the depreciation expense for year 2 can be calculated as follows:

Depreciation expense for Year 2 = ($33,000 – $7,000) × (34,000 ÷ 100,000)  

                                                       = $26,000 × 0.34

Depreciation expense for Year 2 = $8,840

Therefore, the amount of depreciation expense to be recognized in Year 2 assuming that Friedman uses the units-of-production method is $8,840.

You might be interested in
Consider some determinants of the price elasticity of demand: • The availability of close substitutes• Whether the good is a nec
kondor19780726 [428]

Answer:

Inelastic demand, Amputation procedure

Explanation:

The good with no close substitute is likely to experience inelastic demand because the consumer does not any close substitute to change to, this means that even when price is increased, the consumer is not likely to stop buying if the good is a necessary good.

The Amputation procedure will have least elastic demand because the diabetes sufferer does not have close substitute to change to when price increase while Diamond necklace is a luxury good, when the price is increased the consumer stop buying or switch to other luxury goods such as gold, silver that are equally used for decoration purposes.

8 0
3 years ago
Why is it difficult for most small business owners to raise the capital needed to start, operate, or expand their ventures?
Andre45 [30]

Answer:

1. It is not easy to get funds for a start up, as many banks do not consider it as a successful decision to provide loan to a start up, as the feasibility of recovery of loan cannot be identified and guaranteed.

2. Venture capitalists also faces the same issue as of bank, also they are large equity investors and tend to invest in even larger project.

3. Private investors do not blindly invest and rather are more cautious then banks or venture capitalists, as because they do not huge funds to invest, and with less amount of investment they need even higher assurance.

4. Public stock is never available for a start up as for public stock issue you need great credibility, and good previous record.

4 0
2 years ago
When comparing Mexico to Scotland, you would expect Scottish workers to have ________. more satisfaction worse working condition
Fudgin [204]

When comparing Mexico to Scotland, you would expect Scottish workers to have greater productivity and higher labour cost per worker

Explanation:

One may expect that a Scotland plant will be less labour intensive and efficient per worker than just Mexican facilities as a more advanced technological nation and that "higher productivity and low labour cost" will be the right answer.

Both possibilities for lower productivity can be excluded as they demonstrate lower productivity. "Higher productivity, but less energy per job" is not the solution because it recognises lower labour costs per worker rather than higher.

The increase in labour productivity relies, according to certain studies, on three key factors: innovation and capital goods saving, modern technology and human capital.

5 0
2 years ago
A tax exempt municipality is considering the construction of a new municipal waste water treatment facility. Two different sites
In-s [12.5K]

Answer:

The incremental benefit/cost ratio for Alt A is 2.15 and The incremental benefit/cost ratio for Alt B is 1.35

Explanation:

In order to calculate the incremental benefit/cost ratio for both of the two alternatives we would have to make the following calculations:

For ALT A

PV of benefits = $2,111,404 * [1-(1.06)^-75]/0.06 = $34,744,943.5

Therefore, incremental benefit cost ratio = $34,744,943.5/$16,161,644 = 2.15

The incremental benefit/cost ratio for Alt A is 2.15

For ALT B

incremental benefits = ($3,019,639 -$2,111,404) * [1-(1.06)^-75]/0.06 = $14,945,777.2

incremental benefits = $27,211,376 - $16,161,644 = $11,049,732

Therefore, incremental benefit cost ratio = $14,945,777.2/$11,049,732 = 1.35

The incremental benefit/cost ratio for Alt B is 1.35

5 0
3 years ago
The following situations refer only to the preceding data; there is no connectionbetween the situations. Unless stated otherwise
jek_recluse [69]

Answer:

If prices are cut by $0.2 then the operating income will increase by $91,200.

Explanation:

Current Gross Profit is :

Revenue [240,000 * $6] = $1,440,000

Cost of Sales = $1,416,000

Gross Profit = $24,000

If selling price is reduced to $5.80

Revenue $5.80 * [ 240,000 * 1.10 % ] = $1,531,200

Cost of Sales $1,416,000

Gross Profit = $115,200

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Identify the appropriate step in the communication process.
    8·1 answer
  • Almost all tasks in a project will be connected using either _____ or _____ dependencies.Select an answer:a)start-to-finish; fin
    15·2 answers
  • Fergie has the choice between investing in a State of New York bond at 9.4 percent and a Surething Inc. bond at 12.0 percent. As
    10·1 answer
  • Jean's Vegetable Market had the following transactions during 2017: 1. Issued $50,000 of par value common stock for cash. 2. Rep
    6·1 answer
  • The​ stockholders' equity of Kowalski Company at the beginning and end of 2018 totaled $ 122 comma 000 and $ 140 comma 000​, res
    12·1 answer
  • Given that unit cost = $25, annual carrying charge = 10%, annual demand = 4000 units and ordering cost = $15 per order, the eoq
    9·1 answer
  • Betty, an American, works for an automobile manufacturer in New Jersey. Her manager, Ruth, sends her on an overseas assignment t
    8·1 answer
  • Hygfgfngfjgfjggfjffgfjgfjfgtjdftr6j
    11·2 answers
  • An investor sells short 200 shares of ABC stock at $5.25 a share. He sells two put contracts (100 shares each) with a striking p
    10·1 answer
  • In a natural-language processing (nlp) system, the _____ activity involves accepting human language as input, carrying out the c
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!