The question is Algebraically 10(a number) = 42,300. Find (a number) x 500.
You are almost correct. You take 42,300 and divide by 10, but then you take the solution of that, 4,230, and multiply that solution by 500 to get the final answer of 2,115,000
Answer:
m=47 n=52
Step-by-step explanation:
9) +1/6 if it’s not fractions tell me
The reasonable estimate for the length of side DE is 3 units
Find the diagram of the question attached. The given triangle ABC and BDE are similar triangles.
Using the similarity theorem of a triangle, this is expressed as:
AC = DE
Using the pythagoras theorem to get the length of AC:
AB^2 = AC^2 + BC^2
5^2 + AC^2 + 4^2
AC^2 = 25 - 16
AC^2 = 9
AC= 3
Since AC = DE, hence the reasonable estimate for the length of side DE is 3 units
Learn more on similar shapes here: brainly.com/question/14285697
Answer:
- 3log(10) -2log(5) ≈ 1.60206
- no; rules of logs apply to any base. ln(x) ≈ 2.302585×log(x)
- no; the given "property" is nonsense
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>1.</h3>
The given expression expression can be simplified to ...
3log(10) -2log(5) = log(10^3) -log(5^2) = log(1000) -log(25)
= log(1000/25) = log(40) . . . . ≠ log(5)
≈ 1.60206
Or, it can be evaluated directly:
= 3(1) -2(0.69897) = 3 -1.39794
= 1.60206
__
<h3>2.</h3>
The properties of logarithms apply to logarithms of any base. Natural logs and common logs are related by the change of base formula ...
ln(x) = log(x)/log(e) ≈ 2.302585·log(x)
__
<h3>3.</h3>
The given "property" is nonsense. There is no simplification for the product of logs of the same base. There is no expansion for the log of a sum. The formula for the log of a power does apply:

Numerical evaluation of Mr. Kim's expression would prove him wrong.
log(3)log(4) = (0.47712)(0.60206) = 0.28726
log(7) = 0.84510
0.28726 ≠ 0.84510
log(3)log(4) ≠ log(7)