All categories

3 years ago

Suppose the mass of a jelly bean is less than the mass of a gum drop.

Chemistry

2 answers:

Eddi Din [679]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Since it is given that the mass of a jelly bean is less than the mass of a gum drop.

So, when we counted out 10 of each kind of candy and measured the mass of each kind of candy, the mass of the jellybeans would be less than the mass of the gumdrops.

This is because mass of jelly bean is less and even if we take take or more jelly beans then also their total mass will remain less than the total mass of same number of gum drops

Explanation:

Anettt [7]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:its a

Explanation:

You might be interested in

How many alcohols and ethers share the molecular formula c2h6o?

Nadya [2.5K]

Answer is: there are two compounds with molecular formula C₂H₆O, one alcohol and one ethar.

Alcohol with molecular formula C₂H₆O is ethanol or ethyl alcohol (C₂H₅OH).

Ethanol is a volatile, flammable, colorless liquid with characteristic odor.

Ether with molecular formula C₂H₆O is dimethyl ether (CH₃OCH₃).

Dimethyl ether is a colorless gas.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A buret is filled with 0.1517 M A 25.0 mL portion of an unknown acid and two drops of indicator are added to an Erlenmeyer flask

erik [133]

Answer:

Molarity of Unknown Acid = 0.1332 M

Explanation:

Data for solving problem:

Molarity of base in buret (M₁)= 0.1517 M

volume of the acid in Erlenmeyer flask (V₂)= 25.0 mL

Volume of the base in the buret (V₁) = final volume of buret - initial volume in buret

final volume of buret = 22.5 mL

initial volume in buret = 0.55 mL

Volume of the base in the buret (V₁) = 22.5 mL -0.55 mL = 21.95 mL

Volume of the base in the buret (V₁) = 21.95 mL

Molarity of Unknown acid in the Erlenmeyer flask (M₂) = To be find

Explanation:

It is acid base titration and formula for this titration is as follows:

Molarity of base x Volume of base = Molarity of acid x volume of acid

it can be written as

M₁V₁ = M₂V₂ -------------------- equation (1)

we have to find M₂

so by rearrangment the equation (1)

M₁V₁ / V₂ = M₂ ------------------ equation (2)

put the values in equation in equation (2)

M₂ = 0.1517 M x 21.95 mL / 25.0 mL

M₂ = 3.3298 /25.0

M₂ = 0.1332 M

so the Molarity of Unknown acid is <u>0.1332 M</u>

5 0

4 years ago

How many moles of AlCl3 are produced

Leto [7]

The correct answer is 124 ✌

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How can you determine which bond in a structure is more polar without using an electronegativity table?

UkoKoshka [18]

To know this you pretty much do have to kind of memorize a few electronegativities. I don't recall ever getting a table of electronegativities on an exam.
From the structure, you have:

I remember the following electronegativities most because they are fairly patterned:
EN
H
=
2.1
EN
C
=
2.5
EN
N
=
3.0
EN
O
=
3.5
EN
F
=
4.0
EN
Cl
=
3.5
Notice how carbon through fluorine go in increments of
~
0.5
. I believe Pauling made it that way when he determined electronegativities in the '30s.
Δ
EN
C
−
Cl
=
1.0
Δ
EN
C
−
H
=
0.4
Δ
EN
C
−
C
=
0.0
Δ
EN
C
−
O
=
1.0
Δ
EN
O
−
H
=
1.4
So naturally, with the greatest electronegativity difference of
4.0
−
2.5
=
1.5
, the
C
−
F
bond is most polar, i.e. that bond's electron distribution is the most drawn towards the more electronegative compound as compared to the rest.
When the electron distribution is polarized and drawn towards a more electronegative atom, the less electronegative atom has to move inwards because its nucleus was previously favorably attracted to the electrons from the other atom.
That means generally, the greater the electronegativity difference between two atoms is, the shorter you can expect the bond to be, insofar as the electronegative atom is the same size as another comparable electronegative atom.
However, examining actual data, we would see that on average, in conditions without other bond polarizations occuring:
r
C
−
Cl
≈
177 pm
r
C
−
C
≈
154 pm
r
C
−
O
≈
143 pm
r
C
−
F
≈
135 pm
r
C
−
H
≈
109 pm
r
O
−
H
≈
96 pm
So it is not necessarily the least electronegativity difference that gives the longest bond.
Therefore, you cannot simply consider electronegativity. Examining the radii of the atoms, you should notice that chlorine is the biggest atom in the compound.
r
Cl
≈
79 pm
r
C
≈
70 pm
r
H
≈
53 pm
r
O
≈
60 pm
So assuming the answer is truly
C
−
C
, what would have to hold true is that:
The
C
−
F
bond polarization makes the carbon more electropositive (which is true).
The now more electropositive carbon wishes to attract bonding pairs from chlorine closer, thereby shortening the
C
−
Cl
bond, and potentially the
C
−
H
bond (which is probably true).
The shortening of the
C
−
Cl
bond is somehow enough to be shorter than the
C
−
C
bond (this is debatable).

5 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

1. Draw a wedge/dash structure for trans-1,2-dimethylcyclohexane.

Angelina_Jolie [31]

Answer:

The structure with the ring flipped is the most stable

Explanation:

We have the trans 1,2 - dimethylcyclohexane. With the wedge/dash structure we could not figure is this form is stable (If we do a comparison with the cis structure). But when we do a chair structure and ring flipped structure, this is easier to look.

The picture attached shows the structures, they are labeled as 1, 2 and 3, according to this problem.

In the chair structure, according to the picture below, you can see that both methyls are heading in the axial positions of the ring (One facing upward and the other downward). This is pretty stable, however, when the methyls are in those positions, the methyl position 1, can undergoes an 1,3 diaxial interactions with the hydrogens atoms (They are not drawn, but still are there), so this interaction makes this structure a little less stable that it can be.

On the other side, the ring flipped structure, we can see that both methyls are in the equatorials positions of the ring, and in these positions, it can avoid the 1,4 diaxial interactions with the hydrogens atoms, making this structure the most stable structure.

Hope this helps

6 0

3 years ago