The conclusion drawn is inappropriate because the data collection is unreliable and the method used for collection is wrong.
Explanation:
The use of wrong methods for the collection of data for such studies and then drawing conclusions out of them is one of the causes for the study to be said to be unreliable completely.
There is no way to reliably conclude the age at which the children start to walk by talking to the parents as parents do not qualify or take time data of the time children start walking.
The parents are unreliable sources here no matter how big the sample size is and only the researchers themselves could notice and get the reliable results required in this case.
Answer:
actor-observer discrepancy
Explanation:
Actor-observer discrepancy: In social psychology, the term actor-observer discrepancy or bias is defined as an individual's propensity to attribute his or her actions to some external causes whereas he or she attributes the other person's behavior or actions to some internal causes.
It is considered as a form of attributional bias that leads to develop the way an individual interacts or perceive the other person. It generally covers others and one's behavioral attributions.
In the question above, the given statement is referred to as actor-observer discrepancy.
Answer:
Hello! I would suggest a bubble map, and I will leave the file to what one looks like!
Explanation:
Answer: hypothesizing scores will be equivalent if they play the same amount of time.
In order for Kayla to be sure why her male and female friends scores vary, she should hypothesize their scores for playing the same amount of time because that's the only differing factor that she has observed.
