It is important for researchers to use precise operational definitions when they want to be able to replicate the experiment.
<h3>What are operational definitions?</h3>
These are the definitions and the surrounding theories behind a research work or study.
These are replicable procedures that are done in order to represent a construct in the field of research.
Read more on research here: brainly.com/question/968894
I believe the answer is: <span>It pointed out racial problems in the South but ignored racial injustice in the North.
The 'i had a dream' speech by Martin Luther King was aimed to bring equality to all race and ethnicity across the country, both north and the south.
It highlight the economic disparity between racial minorities and majority in united states, which limit potential development for the minorities.</span>
<u>Answer:
</u>
This finding illustrates that the participants were selectively attentive.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- When the participants were directed to pay attention to the ball and count the number of times the ball is passed, the brain devoted itself to consider nothing else important but the ball.
- The act of counting the passes fetched the attention of the participants as they directed their brains by commanding it to restrict its attention solely on the ball. This trait of the brain is known as selective attention.
There is no right or wrong, which distinguishes Christian ethics from strictly scientific ethics for a number of reasons.
<h3>What distinctions exist between Christian and scientific ethics?</h3>
The sciences have been and continue to be supported by Christianity. Many clergy have been involved in the sciences, and it has been widely used in the construction of schools, universities, and hospitals. Christian ethics is not a theory, model, framework, or intellectual creation of either humans or the divine. Christian ethics are fundamentally distinct from those of all other world religions. Each ethical philosophy offers concepts (propositions) regarding what is right and wrong. These concepts are either human conceptions or they are said to be divine. Scientific and religious explanations can in reality conflict when religious explanations explicitly make use of or presuppose empirical truths and when these claims are known to be true. Religion deals with the spiritual and supernatural, whereas science studies the natural world; as a result, the two can complement one another. There need not be a tension between religious belief and the scientific view of evolution, according to statements made by several religious organizations.
To know more about Christian ethics and scientific ethics, click here:
brainly.com/question/21842202
#SPJ4
