The opportunity cost in the scenario above is the three lost possibilities, Harry could have undergone but decided to go to his parents house.
- Hid plans to paint his flat that weekend.
- He considered also going fishing for the weekend.
- Hi friend Theo request to the surprise birthday reception for another friend.
<h3>What is the opportunity cost in the scenario?</h3>
“Possibility cost is the importance of the next-best alternative when a determination is made; it's what is given up,” explains Andrea Caceres-Santamaria, senior economic education specialist at the St. Louis Fed, in a current Page One Economics: Money and Overlooked Opportunities
To learn more about opportunity cost, refer
brainly.com/question/481029
#SPJ9
Answer:
Pesanteur is gravity
Explanation:
Gravity is a force of attraction that exists between any two masses, any two bodies, any two particles. Gravity is not just the attraction between objects and the Earth. It is an attraction that exists between all objects, everywhere in the universe
Answer:
Dakara watashi wa sore ga tada no orokana pankudearu koto o ki ni shimasen! !
Explanation:
Watashi wa sono orokamono o kinishinai! !
Bolivar stood apart from his class in ideas, values and vision. Who else would be found in the midst of a campaign swinging in a hammock, reading the French philosophers? His liberal education, wide reading, and travels in Europe had broadened his horizons and opened his mind to the political thinkers of France and Britain. He read deeply in the works of Hobbes and Spinoza, Holbach and Hume; and the thought of Montesquieu and Rousseau left its imprint firmly on him and gave him a life-long devotion to reason, freedom and progress. But he was not a slave of the Enlightenment. British political virtues also attracted him. In his Angostura Address (1819) he recommended the British constitution as 'the most worthy to serve as a model for those who desire to enjoy the rights of man and all political happiness compatible with our fragile nature'. But he also affirmed his conviction that American constitutions must conform to American traditions, beliefs and conditions.
His basic aim was liberty, which he described as "the only object worth the sacrifice of man's life'. For Bolivar liberty did not simply mean freedom from the absolutist state of the eighteenth century, as it did for the Enlightenment, but freedom from a colonial power, to be followed by true independence under a liberal constitution. And with liberty he wanted equality – that is, legal equality – for all men, whatever their class, creed or colour. In principle he was a democrat and he believed that governments should be responsible to the people. 'Only the majority is sovereign', he wrote; 'he who takes the place of the people is a tyrant and his power is usurpation'. But Bolivar was not so idealistic as to imagine that South America was ready for pure democracy, or that the law could annul the inequalities imposed by nature and society. He spent his whole political life developing and modifying his principles, seeking the elusive mean between democracy and authority. In Bolivar the realist and idealist dwelt in uneasy rivalry.
