Answer:
A. (1, -2)
Step-by-step explanation:
We can substitute the variables of x and y into the inequality of 
.
Let's start with A, -2 being y and 1 being x.
The absolute value of 1 is 1, and negating that gets us -1.
Indeed, -2 is less than -1! So A is a solution to the inequality.
Let's test the rest of them, just in case.
For B:
Absolute value of 1 is 1, negating it is -1.
-1 is EQUAL to -1, not less than it, so is not a solution to the inequality.
Let's try C.
Absolute value of 1 is 1, negating it is -1.
0 is GREATER than -1, so that is not a solution to the inequality.
Hope this helped!
Answer:
i hope this works. Feel better soon!
Step-by-step explanation:
1.SAS 2 AAS 3 SAS 4 NOT CONGRUENT 5 SSS 6 ASA
7. ∠BAC≅∠EDC given, BC ≅ CE GIVEN ∠ACB≅∠DCE VERTICAL ANGLES, ΔABC≅ΔDEC AAS
8. ∠PQR≅∠TSR GIVEN R IS MIDPOINT OF PT GIVEN PQ≅ST GIVEN ΔPQR≅ΔTSR HYPOTENUSE LEG THEORUM
9. AC BISECTS BCD GIVEN ∠ABD≅∠ADC GIVEN ∠ACB≅∠ADC BISECTED ANGLES AC≅AC REFLEXIVE PROPERTY OF CONGRUENCE ΔABC≅ΔADC ASA AB≅AC SAME SIDES OF CONGRUENT TRIANGLES
You would have 198,324 pesos. All you have o do is multiply 1,983.24 by 100
Well is just their sum, thus
Answer:
Solving for t : t=5+2r/5
Solving for r : r=-25/2+5t/2
Step-by-step explanation: Move all of your terms that don't contain r to the right side and solve. Move all terms that don't contain t to the right side and solve.
Hope this helps you out! ☺ I just solved it and I don't have any choices to go off of and so I just solved it. Sorry if it's wrong. ☺
