Answer:
The main economic benefit that debt rescheduling has for developing countries is that it changes principal and interest payments to more favorable conditions.
This means that after the reschedule, developing countries will have to put less resources into the payments of public debt, which allows them to have more resources available for other public investments like education, healthcare, and infraestructure.
Step six is to complete the plan.
The basic six steps are:
- receiving the requirements
- issuing a warning order
- making the tentative plan
- initiating the movement
- conducting the <span>reconnaissance, and finally
</span>- completing the plan
It is also advisable to follow the 6 steps by two additional steps which are:
- issuing the complete order
- supervision
Answer and Explanation:
As per the data given in the question,
1)
Fair value per share = $20.4
Number of Share = 2 million
Fair value of award = Fair value per share ×Number of Share
= $20.4 × 2 million
= $40.8 million
2) No Entry
3)
Compensation expense($40.8 million÷4 years) $10.2 million
To Paid in capital - restricted stock($20.4-$10.2) $10.2 million
(Being the compensation expense is recorded)
4)
Fair value per share = $20.4
Share granted = 2 million
(100%-10%) forfeiture rate = 90%
fair value of award = $20.4×2×90%
= $36.72 million
Answer:
journal entry for every date be below
Explanation:
solution
journal entry for every date is here
date particular Debit credit
June 5 Purchase Inventory ( 210× $21 ) $4410
to cash/bank $4410
( 210 inventory purchased at $21 each)
June 9 cash/bank A/c ( 30 × $21 ) $630
Purchases Returns (Inventory ) A/c $630
( 30 inventory return )
June 16 cash/bank A/c 210 -30 × ($37 ) $6660
Cost of good sold 210 -30 × ($21 ) $3780
sales A/c 210 -30 × ($37 ) $6660
inventory A/c 210 -30 × ($21 ) $3780
remaining inventory sold at $37
A.
If you recall, negative externalities arise when there is a divergence between marginal private cost and marginal social cost, the difference being the marginal external cost as shown from the poorly drawn diagram. If we got rid of the marginal external cost by producing less, then the externality would dissipate.
However, the question is weird as there are no options for compensation. What would rather happen is that whoever has the property rights will be compensated the size of the MEC and there would be social welfare, whereas the question only tackles removing the externality through stopping production.