It depends a big part of the impact was there farming and cultivating part
<u>Answer</u>:
The Pendleton Civil Service Act intended to reform the federal hiring practices.
<u>Explanation</u>:
This act was to ensure federal employment based on merit rather than hiring based on affiliations with political parties. Following the widespread corruption and incompetence post Civil war, the public demanded civil service to be reformed.
All the citizens were to be given equal opportunity for employment for federal services regardless of their national origin, race, ethnicity, etc. This provided protection to the federal employees. It was also according to this act illegal to demote government officials for political reasons. A commission was formed to ensure the merit system.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Impersonal communications, such as a dialogue between a car salesperson and a possible customer, is predicated on societal roles. Interpersonal communications is the exchange of feelings between people using both spoken and unconscious signals.
In other words, Impersonal interaction is when you treat another individual like an instrument or a character in a performance. Interpersonal communication is defined as two individuals attempting to influence each another at the same time, generally with the aim of forming a connection.
The Oak Elm Willow Sycamore tree gives the concept of an arching firework effect.
<h3>
What was the impact of the arching fireworks?</h3>
Since the early observance in July 1777, fireworks have been an integrated part of US Independence Day, the anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence.
Increased sound levels can cause agitation, hearing loss (temporary or permanent), elevated blood pressure, and sleep disturbances. Respiratory issues such as chronic or allergic bronchitis, bronchial asthma, sinusitis, rhinitis, pneumonia, and laryngitis can all be caused by fireworks
As a result, the Oak Elm Willow tree is the source of the arching firework effect.
Learn more about fireworks:
brainly.com/question/1593605
#SPJ1
Answer:
It is not always necessary to lie.
Explanation:
Lying is not "always" a necessity. Most times, people tell lies to get away from a situation: to deny allegations, to escape punishment or even to escape from shame of the moments. people that lie, if properly investigated, have something they are hiding or they usually have a bad situation (although not always) they want to get away from. This is why people lie. More so, some people also lie to cover their excesses or to gain advantage over a situation. This is the reason why when a person lies, he or she has broken the trust put in him or her by friends, family, colleagues and even bosses. So can we now say that, it is justifiable to break the heart of our loved ones because lie is a necessity? No! When a person is caught lying, trust goes out the window in most cases, and it has to be rebuilt again, all in the name of lie necessary.
From the situations stated above, it can therefore be concluded that, lying is not necessary if people are willing to face the consequence of their actions or if they can stand the shame of their actions also.
