7.77/129.5 = 0.06
Therefore the tax rate is 6%
Answer:
If we define the random variable X ="time spend by the students doign homework"
And we want to tes t is students spend more than 1 hour doing homework per night, on average (alternative hypothesis), so then the system of hypothesis for this case are:
Null hypothesis: 
Alternative hypothesis: 
And they wnat to use a sample size of n = 100 and a significance level of 0.05
Step-by-step explanation:
Previous concepts
A hypothesis is defined as "a speculation or theory based on insufficient evidence that lends itself to further testing and experimentation. With further testing, a hypothesis can usually be proven true or false".
The null hypothesis is defined as "a hypothesis that says there is no statistical significance between the two variables in the hypothesis. It is the hypothesis that the researcher is trying to disprove".
The alternative hypothesis is "just the inverse, or opposite, of the null hypothesis. It is the hypothesis that researcher is trying to prove".
Solution to the problem
If we define the random variable X ="time spend by the students doign homework"
And we want to tes t is students spend more than 1 hour doing homework per night, on average (alternative hypothesis), so then the system of hypothesis for this case are:
Null hypothesis: 
Alternative hypothesis: 
And they wnat to use a sample size of n = 100 and a significance level of 0.05
3/4 times 16/9 is equal to 1 1/3.
Answer: Statements 1 and 2 shows that the coach blowing the whistle happened first.
Step-by-step explanation: The coach blowing the whistle as the first event can be seen only from statements 1 and 2 only.
From statement 1, "the referee blew the whistle" was followed by "the team ran onto the field."
From statement 2, "before the team ran onto the field" shows clearly that one event took place "BEFORE" the one being reported and the one that occurred before this one was "the referee blew the whistle."
Statement 3 which is "the referee blew the whistle, BUT..." indicates that the whistle was meant to prevent the team from from running onto the field. So if the referee blew the whistle, but the team ran onto the field, it means the whistle blowing was not supposed to make them run onto the field.
Statement 4, which states that "the referee blew the whistle BECAUSE the team ran onto the field" indicates that, the reason for blowing the whistle was because the team ran onto the field which clearly shows that the team ran onto the field first before the referee blew the whistle.
Statement 5, "WHILE the team ran onto the field..." clearly shows that both events took place at the same moment, and so the referee blowing the whistle could not have occurred first.