The answer is X>-7 for your question
Answer:
a) Objective function (minimize cost):

Restrictions
Proteins per pound: 
Vitamins per pound: 
Non-negative values: 
b) Attached
c) The optimum solution (minimum cost) is 0 pounds of ingredient A and 0.75 pounds of ingredient B. The cost is $0.15 per ration.
d) The optimum solution changes. The cost is now 0 pounds of ingredient A and 0.625 pounds of ingredient B. The cost is $0.125 per ration.
Step-by-step explanation:
a) The LP formulation for this problem is:
Objective function (minimize cost):

Restrictions
Proteins per pound: 
Vitamins per pound: 
Non-negative values: 
b) The feasible region is attached.
c) We have 3 corner points. In one of them lies the optimal solution.
Corner A=0 B=0.75

Corner A=0.5 B=0.5

Corner A=0.75 B=0

The optimum solution (minimum cost) is 0 pounds of ingredient A and 0.75 pounds of ingredient B. The cost is $0.15 per ration.
d) If the company requires only 5 units of vitamins per pound rather than 6, one of the restrictions change.
The feasible region changes two of its three corners:
Corner A=0 B=0.625

Corner A=0.583 B=0.333

Corner A=0.75 B=0

The optimum solution changes. The cost is now 0 pounds of ingredient A and 0.625 pounds of ingredient B. The cost is $0.125 per ration.
Jason earned $356.7375 for 37.75 hours in a week.
<h3>How to find the earning of jason for 37.75 hours?</h3>
multiplying the weekly hours by the number of weeks in a year yields the total number of hours worked. Then subtract this amount from the annual pay.
given that
Jason works at Klein dry cleaning. he earned $9.45 per hour.
Now find if he worked 37.75 hours this week what is his pay.
so simply multiply $9.45 with 37.75 hours to obtain the Jason earning of the week.

Hence,Jason earned $356.7375 for 37.75 hours in a week.
if you can check it is correct or not. simply divide the 356.7375 with 37.75.
Learn more about problems on earnings, refer:
brainly.com/question/25641320
#SPJ9
Answer:
d=rt In this problem we are looking for the distance, but we will have to go about it indirectly. If she's traveling the same exact road going and returning, then the distance traveled both ways is exactly the same. Since d = rt, and d is the same, by the substitution property, if and , then , and . So we need to rt for the trip going, rt for the trip returning and set them equal to each other and solve for t. Going is a rate of 24, and the time is t (since we don't know t), and returning is a rate of 30, and the time is 13 1/3-t. (If the whole trip takes 13 1/3 hours, and t is the time going, then the time returning is the difference between the total time and the going time. That concept is one that baffles most algebra students!). So our r1t1 is 24t, and our r2t2 is 30(13 1/3 - t). Set them equal to each other and that will look like this: That fraction of 40/3 is 13 1/3 made into an improper fraction. Distributing that we will have and 54t = 400. That means that t = 7.407. We have time, and that's great, but we need distance! Go back to one of your equations for distance and sub in t and solve for d. d = 24t, and d = 24(7.407), so d = 177.768 miles.