So 1st consider that it's a square! That's very important. So for a square, all 4 sides are equal.
And now considering that the given information is the diameter. So any angle made at the circle extended from the 2 points of diameter gives an angle of 90°
Now consider one triangle. So we already know that 2 sides of the triangle are equal (because they are 2 sides of a square) , has a side of 10 (diameter) and and angle of 90°. So remaining 2 angles are 45°
Now solve it by applying
Answer:
If the hypotenuse and one leg of a right triangle are congruent to the hypotenuse and one leg of another right triangle, then the triangles are congruent.
Step-by-step explanation:
I think 5X+1x. Sorry if it's wrong.
Answer:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2499c/2499c700e717cd9b0452c2a79a461716a1ec3db5" alt="CI=\{-0.2941,-0.0337\}"
Step-by-step explanation:
Assuming conditions are met, the formula for a confidence interval (CI) for the difference between two population proportions is
where
and
are the sample proportion and sample size of the first sample, and
and
are the sample proportion and sample size of the second sample.
We see that
and
. We also know that a 98% confidence level corresponds to a critical value of
, so we can plug these values into the formula to get our desired confidence interval:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c232/4c2324cbfdd0242a94e587f0fbebc8a5d1031971" alt="\displaystyle CI=(\hat{p}_1-\hat{p}_2)\pm z^*\sqrt{\frac{\hat{p}_1(1-\hat{p}_1)}{n_1}+\frac{\hat{p}_2(1-\hat{p}_2)}{n_2}}\\\\CI=\biggr(\frac{87}{249}-\frac{58}{113}\biggr)\pm 2.33\sqrt{\frac{\frac{87}{249}(1-\frac{87}{249})}{249}+\frac{\frac{58}{113}(1-\frac{58}{113})}{113}}\\\\CI=\{-0.2941,-0.0337\}"
Hence, we are 98% confident that the true difference in the proportion of people that live in a city who identify as a democrat and the proportion of people that live in a rural area who identify as a democrat is contained within the interval {-0.2941,-0.0337}
The 98% confidence interval also suggests that it may be more likely that identified democrats in a rural area have a greater proportion than identified democrats in a city since the differences in the interval are less than 0.