Explain why amendments were needed to change rules about presidential elections, terms, and succession.

Social Studies

1 answer:

Marizza181 [45]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The need for amending the procedures set forth in the Constitution for electing a president and vice president were necessary because of the ambiguity in Article II, Section I.

Explanation:

Before the 12th Amendment, the vice presidents were chosen from the same pool of candidates that stood presidential elections. The vice president was usually the runner up and that made Thomas Jefferson, from the from the Democratic-Republican Party, the vice president elect during the 1976 election while John Adam was the first in the election, the president elect from the Federalist Party. The ratification of the 12th amendment in 1804 paved way for both president and vice to appear under same party ticket.

In the 20th Amendment, January 20 became the date for the swearing in of the president and vice president unlike what was obtainable.

The constitution did not talk about the term limits until the 22nd Amendment , which put a two-term limit on the presidential tenure arrangements.

You might be interested in

What is sugauli treaty and when was its singned? very short answer question

o-na [289]

Answer:

what is sugauli treaty:the treaty that established the boundary line of nepal, was signed on 2 december 1815 and ratified by 4 march 1816 between the east India company.

when was its signed:March 4, 1816

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which answers describe the push-pull theory of migration

Furkat [3]

Explanation:

hope this helps

5 0

2 years ago

Individuals who target private branch exchanges (pbx) for intraoffice phone communication are known as phreakers.

lord [1]

The answer is that, "the given statement is true".

We can define a phreak as somebody who breaks into the phone network wrongfully, regularly to make free long-remove telephone calls or to tap telephone lines. The term is currently in some cases used to incorporate any individual who breaks or endeavors to break the security of any system.

5 0

3 years ago

What are three of the different stages that society has gone through?

deff fn [24]

Fish first then Apes then Humans

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In the case Schenk v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution does not protect a person when "falsely shout

Ket [755]

Answer:

<h3>Freedom of speech.</h3>

Explanation:

Freedom of speech is a principal that advocates the freedom of a person to state his/her opinion freely and to impart information and ideas without any restrictions.

However, in the case of Schenk v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution does not protect a person when "falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing panic" because freedom of speech does not protect speech that has the potential to incite danger and disharmony in the society.
Therefore, in the case of Schenk v. United States, freedom of speech of First Amendment was limited.

6 0

3 years ago