1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nika2105 [10]
3 years ago
8

Although the United States had been supporting France's effort in retaining control of Vietnam, why did the United States contin

ue to give aid to South Vietnam following France's defeat in 1954?
History
1 answer:
alexdok [17]3 years ago
4 0
As it was part of the Truman Doctrine, to keep communism contained, so they funded South Vietnam so that it could fight off North Communist Vietnam.
You might be interested in
What was on of the immediate consequences of the partition of India?
Anastaziya [24]

Answer:

Partition triggered riots, mass casualties, and a colossal wave of migration. Millions of people moved to what they hoped would be safer territory, with Muslims heading towards Pakistan, and Hindus and Sikhs in the direction of India

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
HISTIRY<br> PLS<br> HELP<br> ITS<br> DUE RN<br><br> WILL GIVE BRAINLIST
USPshnik [31]

Answer: i can't under stand this

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Why did the Byzantine empire have such a successful economy
KIM [24]

The Byzantine Empire's economy has always been regarded among the most strongest in the Mediterranean for several centuries. Their solid presence in Constantinople gave them a significant advantage as it was the center of a trading network that ran all throughout Eurasia into North Africa. With trading as their stong suit and a State that tightly controlled both internal and foreign transaction, they were set up for success. The one factor that set them apart has to be <u>their inmplementation of coinage</u>, which consolidated a monopoly around the Byzantine empire.


Hope this helps!


3 0
3 years ago
I really need help on this
PtichkaEL [24]

Do you know the context?

I suppose the quotation is stressing that the writer has put a lot of effort into getting their argument/grievances heard by the parliament, and that said parliament is 'tyrannical', implying that it rules without concern for the people or accountability to them. It seems that the quote may be a way of justifying some later action, essentially saying; 'we've tried and failed to do this in the proper way, so now we must be more forceful'.

7 0
3 years ago
Read this quotation from Winston Churchill. "You were given the choice between war and dishonor. You chose dishonor and you will
grin007 [14]
In this quotation Winston Churchill is expressing reproach with the use of the word dishonor in regards to whoever he believes acted dishonorably. The word reproach means to address someone in a way that expresses disapproval or disappointment (in this case it is disappointment or disapproval in the other parties actions which he has labeled "dishonorable."
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the code takers develop the original version of the Navajo code?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following systems of trade was most widely used in both ancient river civilizations and ancient Native American civ
    9·2 answers
  • Use political machines in a sentence
    7·1 answer
  • Why is the 17th amendment more important than the 16th
    9·1 answer
  • The Northwest Territory consisted of areas north of the Ohio River, west of Pennsylvania, and east of the ______________________
    7·2 answers
  • Over one-third of the population of the South were
    12·1 answer
  • The main role of banks in the nation’s economy is to
    8·1 answer
  • Why are fair rules so important in a market economy?
    10·2 answers
  • What issue should President Biden include in his inaugural address?How can an inaugural address be used to unite?
    8·1 answer
  • Why dont people like me
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!