1.<br> What is the most direct type of heat transfer?<br> radiation<br> conduction

The potential difference between the plates of a capacitor is 145 V. Midway between the plates, a proton and an electron are rel

aniked [119]

Answer:

= 2.52 x 10^ 6 m/s

Explanation:

The force that acts on charged particles between capacitor plates =

F = (q) (Δv) ÷ d

Here, d = distance between the two plates

q = charge of the charged particle

Δv = voltage

Normally, the force that makes both proton and electron released from rest, giving the charge acceleration is F=m X a. where m= mass and a = acceleration

Poting this equation with the first one, we have:

m X a = (q) (Δv) ÷ d

So, the acceleration of a proton when moving towards a negatively charged plate is

a = (q) (Δv) ÷ (d) (m) {proton}

Likewise, the acceleration of an electron when moving towards a positively charged plate is

a = (q) (Δv) ÷ (d) (m) {electron}

Dividing the proton acceleration formula by the electron acceleration formula we have:

a (proton) / a (electron) = m (proton) / m(electron)

inserting equation of motion to get distance, s

s = ut + 1/2 at^2

recall that electron travel distance, d/2

d/2 = 1/2 at^2

making t the subject of the formula

we have, t =√(d ÷ a(electron))

The distance of proton:

d/2 = ut + 1/2 at^2 [proton}

put d/2 = ut + 1/2 at^2 [proton} into t =√(d ÷ a(electron))

Initial speed, ui = √(d ÷ a(electron)) = (d/2) - (1/2) x (d) (a(proton) + a(electron))

since acceleration wasn't given in the question, lets use mass(elect

ron) ÷ mass(proton) rather than use (a(proton) + a(electron))

Therefore, intial speed= 1/2√((e X Δv) ÷ m(electron)) (1- m(electron)/ m(proton))

Note, e = 1.60 x 10^-19

m(electron) = 9.11 X 10^-31

m(proton) = 1.67 X 10^-27

Input these values into the formula above, initial speed, UI =

= 2.52 x 10^ 6 m/s

7 0

3 years ago

Why can we never prove that a hypothesis is true?

erma4kov [3.2K]

A theorem can be proven (from axioms or prior theorems), using logic.

A hypothesis can be supported by evidence. The more evidence in support of the hypothesis, the more likely the hypothesis is to be correct. However, you’re always at the mercy of contrary evidence appearing in the future, to reduce the likelihood or even invalidate a hypothesis.

A (mathematical) proof suffers no such vulnerability to future evidence, as long as you hold the axioms of the theory to be true, and as long as there was no flaw in the construction of the proof.

7 0

3 years ago

What does a lunar eclipse and a solar eclipse have in common

liraira [26]

During either one, the sun, moon, and Earth are lined up in the same straight line. The difference is whether the moon or the Earth is the one in the "middle".

3 0

3 years ago

Positive ions have blank protons than electrons

grandymaker [24]

Postitive ions have more protons than electrons, because protons are positively charged. Electrons have a negative charge, so if there were less protons than electrons the job would be negative. If there were the same amount of both, then the positive and negative charges balance each other out, making a neutral charge.

5 0

3 years ago

3. Hahn determined that barium (atomic number 56) was one of the elements created when a uranium atom (atomic number 92) split .

creativ13 [48]

According to a periodic table, Krypton was created during the fission of Uranium.

<h3>What is the atomic number?</h3>

<em>Atomic</em> number is a characteristic associated with an element and indicates its number of protons, when a fision occurs, the total number protons is conserved.

Thus, the fission of uranium is led by two elements with <em>atomic</em> numbers 56 and 36. According to a periodic table, those <em>atomic</em> numbers are associated to elements Barium (Ba) and Krypton (Kr), respectively.

According to a periodic table, Krypton was created during the fission of Uranium. $\blacksquare$

To learn more on fission, we kindly invite to check this verified question: brainly.com/question/6572079

8 0

2 years ago

1. What is the most direct type of heat transfer? radiation conduction