1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GuDViN [60]
3 years ago
5

Describe how to make a position-time graph.

Physics
1 answer:
salantis [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

There's a video called Drawing Position vs Time Graphs made by MrDGenova that may help you, it's only three minutes long.

Explanation:

Hope that helps, if not, you could tell me what you don't understand and I could try explaining it in further detail.

You might be interested in
5
Ronch [10]

Answer:

Current in a parallel circuit = 0.61 amps (Approx)

Explanation:

Given:

Voltage V = 6 volt

Two resistors = 17.2 , 22.4 in parallel circuit

Find:

Current in a parallel circuit

Computation:

1/R = 1/r1 + 1 / r2

1/R = 1/17.2 + 1 / 22.4

R = 9.73 ohms (Approx)

Current in a parallel circuit = V / R

Current in a parallel circuit = 6 / 9.73

Current in a parallel circuit = 0.61 amps (Approx)

4 0
3 years ago
Two protons moving with same speed in same direction repel each other but what about two protons moving with different speed in
Thepotemich [5.8K]

Answer:In the case of two proton beams the protons repel one another because they have the same sign of electrical charge. There is also an attractive magnetic force between the protons, but in the proton frame of reference this force must be zero! Clearly then the attractive magnetic force that reduces the net force between protons in the two beams as seen in our frame of reference is relativistic. In particular the apparent magnetic forces or fields are relativistic modifications of the electrical forces or fields. As such modifications, they cannot be stronger than the electrical forces and fields that produce them. This follows from the fact that switching frames of reference can reduce forces, but it can’t turn what is attractive in one frame into a repulsive force in another frame.

In the case of wires the net charges in two wires are zero everywhere along the wires. That makes the net electrical forces between the wires very nearly zero. Yet the relativistic magnetic forces and fields will be of the same sort as in the case of two beams of charges of a single sign. This is true even in the frame of reference of what we think as the moving charges, that is, the electrons. In the frame of reference moving at the drift velocity of these current-carrying electrons, it is the protons or positively charged ions that are moving in the other direction. Consequently in any frame of reference for current-carrying wires in parallel, the net electrical force will be essentially zero, and there will be a net attractive magnetic force

Explanation:                                                                              

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The weight of an object on a planet depends not only on its mass, but also on its distance from the planets center. Uranus has m
Ierofanga [76]
The further an object is from the centre of a planet, the lower it's gravitational force. Uranus had 14 times as much mass as earth, but it's also a lot bigger than earth. So assuming an object is on the surface of Uranus, it would be really far away from the centre of Uranus, therefore the gravitational force is less.

Hope this helps!
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Whose view was that the Cosmos was based on the belief that every occurrence in the physical universe had logos behind it and th
Fiesta28 [93]

Answer:

Aristotle

Explanation:

Aristotelian theory of the Universe

For two millennia, the philosophical tradition considered that the universe was eternal and did not change. The wise Aristotle said so, with total clarity and his ideas dominated Western thought for more than two thousand years.

This distinguished philosopher believed that the stars are made of an imperishable matter and that the landscapes of the sky are immutable.

From the time of Aristotle until the beginning of the twentieth century, the idea that the universe was static, that the cosmos had been eternally equal, was admitted.

In those years, the origin of the universe was not really considered in a scientific way, since it was based on the basis that the gods had created everything that exists, at the time they wanted it, according to their omnimous power.

So that all the efforts of the wise men of the time focused on discovering the existing organization in the universe created by the gods.

According to Aristotle and the thinkers of the fourth century B.C. what is below the Moon is a changing world, what is beyond the Moon is an immutable world.

6 0
3 years ago
You can jump 3 m (10 feet) off of a diving board and into a swimming pool and be uninjured. However, if you jumped from the same
Mrac [35]

Answer:

1) this is due to force due to momentum change of a body falling from such a height.

2) they move with velocity of 2.69 m/s towards the right.

Explanation:

1) in the case where one jumps 3 meters into water, the water deform on impact extending the time of impact for your body's momentum to get to zero, so that the time it takes for the momentum of your body due to your mass and your velocity to get to zero is relatively long lessening the force felt due to the impact.

For a fall from the same height onto a concrete, the concrete does not deform at all. This means that there is a very short time for your momentum to get to zero and hence the force is huge. In order to cushion this a little, your body deforms in a bid to reduce the force and this is very deadly.

This is in line with Newton's second law of motion which states that the rate of change of momentum is proportional to the force produced.

2)

M1 = 125 kg

M2 = 80 kg

V1 = 2.5 m/s

V2 = 3 m/s

From momentum conservation, total initial momentum must be equal to the total momentum after collision.

Momentum = mass x velocity.

That is,

M1V1 + M2V2 = (M1 + M2) Vf

Where Vf is their final velocity together.

Note that the masses stick together because the collision is inelastic.

Substituting and solving, we have

(125 x 2.5) + (80 x 3) = (125 + 80)Vf

312.5 + 240 = 205Vf

552.5 = 205Vf

Vf = 552.5/205 = 2.69 m/s

Note that the linebacker runner has the greater momentum 125 x 2.5 = 312.15

This means they both move to the right at velocity of 2.69 m/s

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A girl sits on a tire swing and is pushed in a circular motion by her father. Her tangential speed is 2.8 m/s and the girl trave
    15·2 answers
  • two identical objects move with speeds of 5.0 m s and 25.0 m s. What is the ratio of their kinetic energies?
    5·1 answer
  • Find the minimum radius of a helium balloon that will lift her off the ground. the density of helium gas is 0.178 kg/m3, and the
    11·1 answer
  • Ohm's law states a relationship between voltage, current, and charge. that less current flows when a higher voltage is applied.
    10·1 answer
  • The intensity of electromagnetic waves from the sun is 1.4 kW/m2 just above the earth's atmosphere. Eighty percent of this reach
    11·1 answer
  • If a machine will do 50 J of work in 35 seconds how much power did it produce?
    14·1 answer
  • In a solid, the particles vibrate vibrate on the spot. They do not move around. In a liquid, particles are together. They are to
    11·1 answer
  • Which human activity causes the most erosion?
    13·1 answer
  • Thank you for helppppp
    12·1 answer
  • How much force is required to accelerate a 57 kg skier 4 m/s2? ______ N (do not write anything except the number)
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!