I believe it's C, that is the only one that makes sense to me
Answer:
Thomas should not reject the null hypothesis.
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis is rejected or accepted on the basis of level of significance. When the p-value is greater than level of significance we fail to reject the null hypothesis and null hypothesis is then accepted. It is not necessary that all null hypothesis will be rejected at 10% level of significance. To determine the criteria for accepting or rejecting a null hypothesis we should also consider p-value. Here in this question the test value is -1.73346 and p-value is 0.0830. The p value is greater than the test value therefore the null hypothesis should be accepted.
Answer:
3 times as great
Step-by-step explanation:
The most amount of water is 3/4 full
The least amount of water 1/4 full
To get from 1/4 to 3/4, you multiply by 3:
![\frac{1}{4} * \frac{3}{1} = \frac{3}{4}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%7D%20%20%2A%20%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B1%7D%20%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B4%7D)
(I made 3 into 3/1 to show how you multiply across easier)
3/8 = .375 so we want .375 of $5460.40 or .375 x $5460.40 = $2047.65 savings
To find the checking we simply subtract:
$5460.40 - 2047.65 = $3412.75 - checking
You could also do 5/8 or .625 x $5460.40 to get $3412.75
because 3/8 + 5/8 (or .375+.625) = 1 (1 whole amount to save - in this case $5460.40)
CHOICE 1 $1250+5.5% of sales
$5000x0.055=$275+1250=$1525
$10,000x0.055=$550=1250=$1800
CHOICE 2 $2600=2% of sales
$5000x0.02=$100+2600=$2700
$10000x0.02=$200+2600=$2800
So even though more is earned through percentage of sales in CHOICE 1, it doesn't make up for the larger monthly salary of CHOICE 2