The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question is incomplete because it does not provide any options and further references, we can say that what Mary Parker Follett recommended in this situation are the following.
-Remember that you must have power with, not over your team. So when you ask Andrie and Marjorie, to write more, be sure to give them facts and information they need to understand the reason for your request.
-Get Destiny and Marjorie into one room. Have them present their vision of what a fundraising event should be, and then brainstorm with them to find ways to achieve both of their goals.
So as we see, what Follet recommends is an interesting way to resolve disputes in the workplace. Marjorie and his co-worker Destiny are two people that often disagree mostly on everything, so that is why they have to improve their working relationships in order to be more productive and alleviate the tensions. Otherwise, the heated arguments could erode even more the relationship and create resentfulness on the part of Destiny.
The answer that makes sense is C. Habitat Destruction.
Answer:
France's primary interest in the New-World was fish of the coast of Nova-Scotia
so its fishing
Explanation:
Answer:
Conducting a 360- degree feedback process
Explanation:
A 360-degree feedback is a method or a process by which feedback or opinions from an employee's colleagues, subordinates and supervisor, as well as a self-evaluation by the individual themselves is gathered.
Here, individuals compare views of their own performance with the behaviorally specific performance info from their colleagues manager, subordinates, and peers.
In the context, Dr. Davis invites his colleagues to attend his class and asks them give or provide feedback on his teaching methods and about engaging his students. Thus Dr Davis is trying to conduct a 360- degree feedback process.
