It is FALSE that the most notable positive consequences of modernization are <u>increased feelings of</u><u> isolation</u>.
<h3>What are the consequences of isolation?</h3>
The consequences of isolation, which has been increased by modernization, are:
- Depression
- Anxiety
- Low self-esteem
- Sleep problems
- Increased stress.
Instead, the most notable negative consequences of modernization are <u>increased feelings of </u><u>isolatio</u><u>n</u>.
Thus, it is FALSE that the most notable positive consequences of modernization are <u>increased feelings of</u><u> isolation</u>.
Learn more about isolation at brainly.com/question/791540
#SPJ4
<u>Famers in Sudan with dark skin</u> are some people in her commununity of scientists.
What is linear process ?
A complex, circular workflow for handling "packages" of content that the ILS and current workflows could not support eventually supplanted the linear process of choosing, ordering, billing, receiving, and renewing subscriptions on a title-by-title basis. It soon became apparent that managing ejournals was simply more difficult than managing print serials. In her comparison of the print and electronic serials workflows at the MIT Libraries, Ellen Duranceau (1998: 90), for instance, said that the digital world is cyclical, employs high-level employees almost exclusively, and is utterly unstandardized. At practically every stage, cooperation, collaboration, and teamwork are necessary. There are potentially non-library staff members involved, and there are more than twice as many players.
Learn more about linear process visit here:
brainly.com/question/5343271
#SPJ4
<span>Law Enforcement Appreciation Day was on January 9, 2017.</span>
Answer:
Reasonable doubt standard.
Explanation:
The single most important criterion for determining the level of proof necessary for conviction in criminal trials is Reasonable doubt standard.
Reasonable doubt is the highest standard of proof need to court. It must be exceeded to to prove a convict in a criminal case. It is exclusively used in criminal cases only as the stakes are very high.
In an experiment testing the effects of a treatment, a comparison grouprefers to a group of units (e.g., persons, classrooms) that receive either no TREATMENT or an alternative treatment.