When two products have similar core features, but are produced by different companies, competition results. Research your competition to figure out where you fit in or what to change.
Answer:
Hidden Valley's Asset Turnover = 1.6
Explanation:
Average Total Asset = (Total Assets at the beginning of the year + Total Assets at the end of the year)/2
Average Total Asset = (450,000+550,000)/2
Average Total Asset = 1,000,0000/2 = 500,000
Asset Turnover = Net Sales / Average Total Asset
Asset Turnover = 800,000/500,000
Asset Turnover = 8/5
Asset Turnover = 1.6
Answer:
travel agency
Explanation:
as service businesses include <u>companies engaged in transport</u>, food service, distribution, retail, and other industries that sell services rather than products. These intangibles provide the primary revenue source for service businesses.
Answer:
The fixed cost at any level of activity is $48,000 while the variable cost per unit at any level of activity is $1.30
Explanation:
The total cost is a function of the fixed and variable cost. Whilst the fixed cost does not change at a certain range of activities level, the variable cost changes as the level of activities(units produced or sold).
Using the high and low levels of activities given, let the variable cost per unit be v and the fixed cost F
for the high level,
F + 90,000v = 165,000
For the low level
F + 40,000v = 100,00
Solving both equations simultaneously,
50,000v = 65,000
v = $1.30
F + 40,000($1.30) = 100,000
F = 100,000 - 52,000
F = $48,000
Answer:
Select the answer that best describes the strategies in this game.
- Both companies dominant strategy is to add the train.
Does a Nash equilibrium exist in this game?
- A Nash equilibrium exists where both companies add a train. (Since I'm not sure how your matrix is set up I do not know the specific location).
Explanation:
we can prepare a matrix to determine the best strategy:
Swiss Rails
add train do not add train
$1,500 / $2,000 /
add train $4,000 $7,500
EuroRail
do not add train $4,000 / $3,000 /
$2,000 $3,000
Swiss Rails' dominant strategy is to add the train = $1,500 + $4,000 = $5,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
EuroRail's dominant strategy is to add the train = $4,000 + $7,500 = $11,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
A Nash equilibrium exists because both companies' dominant strategy is to add a train.
