Companies should not be able to own DNA in plants.
Explanation:
It is against the spirit of the world at large and very ill advised to allow companies to own seeds and their DNA which would make them monopolize the produce of certain plants over another.
This can lead to catastrophic changes in the ecosystem as well as the risk that some plants required by people to be free will become costly and lobbied for.
This is a capitalistic endeavor that would lead to too much power in the hands of the corporations.
In which country? England --> It led to liberal reform acts and improved the economy.
Answer:
Women are more likely to be declined for services by insurance companies and third-party payers.
Explanation:
Normally women have been described as having a higher prevalence of psychological disorders and this has been attributed to several factors. One of the factors being that because of their multiple roles, they can undergo more stress. Also women are more likely to undergo stress for poverty and for the violence against them. However, it is unlikely for women to be declined for services by insurance companies and third-party payers.
<u>Answer:
</u>
The trial court should rule that the legislation is unconstitutional because it violates the Commerce Clause.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- Any legislation introduced and implemented by the state legislature inevitably has to comply with the United States Constitution for it to be valid.
- The legislation that is believed to be unconstitutional can be appealed against in the court of law.
- The court can also suo moto take an initiative to examine the constitutionality of the legislation introduced.
A decrease or increase of a certain population can affect the food chain of an ecosystem
Lets say bugs start dying at a rapid rate in an swamp ecosystem
The frog population would then decrease because they have no bugs to eat
The frog’s predators would then decrease because of the number of frogs to eat are decreasing.
So on and so forth.
Hope this helps!
