Answer:
some 200,000 Jews did manage to reach the United States between 1933 and 1945
Explanation:
only know th first
1. They are not sure if they are making the right decision
2.two parties may not be enough
3.they are not educated enough
4.they are not a citizens
A top-down process is happening when you shift your attention to something without moving your eyes.
Top-down theories are driven by hypotheses and emphasize the significance of higher mental processes like expectations, beliefs, values, and social influences.
<h3>What are top-down and bottom-up processing?</h3>
Bottom-up processing starts with the retrieval of sensory data from our surroundings so that perceptions can be built based on the sensory data that is now being input. Top-down processing is the process of interpreting incoming information in light of one's prior experiences, knowledge, and expectations.
Perceptions start with the most general and proceed toward the more detailed top-down processing. Our expectations and prior information have a significant impact on these views. Simply said, your brain uses what it already knows to fill in the gaps and predict what will happen next.
Top-down processing is the process by which we see the world around us and interpret incoming information by using what we already know Gregory, 1970.
Learn more about Shifting your Attention here:
brainly.com/question/28246841
#SPJ4
The correct answer is no.
Alisha was under no obligation to help Timmy, <em>there is no such thing like</em> <em>duty to rescue.</em> There is no legal requirement in the United States to help and rescue someone who is in danger. Even in extreme situation, when a person sees a person falling into a river for example, the witness of the situation is no obliged to assist with help.
There are some cases with some important exceptions: if the defendant created the peril he is obliged to come to the plaintiff's aid, if the defendant started to rescue the plaintiff, he must continue to do so, if the defendant is in a special relationship with the plaintiff ( teacher-student, worker-employer), he is under duty to rescue him.
Alisha was under no duty to inform Timmy's parents of the danger facing him <em>but she should have done it nevertheless.</em> She should at least have phoned them if she didn't have the time to stop by. She knew the boy well and she should have cared more. The need to help the boy should have come from her moral guidance and not as a sense of duty to be performed.
