"Like other settled, agrarian societies in history, those in the Indian subcontinent have been attacked by nomadic tribes throughout its long history. In evaluating the impact of Islam on the sub-continent, one must note that the northwestern sub-continent was a frequent target of tribes raiding from Central Asia. In that sense, the Muslim intrusions and later Muslim invasions were not dissimilar to those of the earlier invasions during the 1st millennium."
<span>Richard M. Frye, "Pre-Islamic and Early Islamic Cultures in Central Asia", in </span>Turko-Persia in Historical Perspective<span>, ed. Robert L. Canfield (Cambridge U. Press c. 1991), 35–53.</span>"
So, MUSLIMS is the answer, does it have this option?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Here we have just a statement. There is no question. However, doing some research we can say that the correct question would be this: <em>"What pieces of evidence would best support the author's conclusion?"</em>
If that is the case, then the correct answer is the following.
The evidence would be the way the Articles of Confederation created a week central government that basically, only had the power to control the post office and deal with Native American Issues. It was the states the ones that were sovereign and could collect money through taxation. So if the Central government needed money, it had to ask the states for it.
That original statement was written by Edmund S. Morgan, in "The Birth of the Republic."
Answer: The executive branch carries out and enforces laws. It includes the president, vice president, the Cabinet, executive departments, independent agencies, and other boards, commissions, and committees. American citizens have the right to vote for the president and vice president through free, confidential ballots
