All categories

3 years ago

Someone please explain how to do this

Mathematics

1 answer:

IrinaK [193]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

I believe the answer would be y = -(1)x - 2

Step-by-step explanation:

First, you look at where the line appears to cross the x-axis. In this problem, it appears to cross at just about -1. Then, you look at where the line crosses the y-axis. It does that at -2 in this problem.

Then, you just plug those numbers into the y = mx + b form. Alternatively, you could just write -x instead of -1x. I just put the -1 to show you.

Edit: If -1x is wrong, you may want to try -0.5x. It's pretty ambiguous as to where the line actually crosses the x axis.

You might be interested in

WILL MARK BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT

Anastasy [175]

Answer: y = one-third x

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Identify the triangles that are similar by the AA similarity theorem. explain how you know that the triangles are similar.

UNO [17]

Angle WVX = Angle YVZ (vertically opposite angles)

Angle VWX = Angle VYZ (shown)

Angle WXV = Angle YZV (total sum of angles in triangle)

4 0

1 year ago

Getaway Travel Agency surveyed a random sample of 454545 of their clients about their vacation plans. Of the clients surveyed, 2

Simora [160]

Answer:

241 clients

Step-by-step explanation:

His problem can be solved using the principle of proportionality or rule three.

We can take advantage of the proportion between respondents who tell us the number of respondents and how many expect to go on vacation and the total number of workers, therefore:

Respondents /// Whole company

Vacations 21 x

Total 45 516

then x equals:

x = (516 * 21) / (45)

x = 240.8

x = 241 clients

This means that approximately 241 clients expect to go on vacation throughout the company.

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Newborn babies: A study conducted by the Center for Population Economics at the University of Chicago studied the birth weights

Fed [463]

Answer:

a) 615

b) 715

c) 344

Step-by-step explanation:

According to the Question,

Given that, A study conducted by the Center for Population Economics at the University of Chicago studied the birth weights of 732 babies born in New York. The mean weight was 3311 grams with a standard deviation of 860 grams

Since the distribution is approximately bell-shaped, we can use the normal distribution and calculate the Z scores for each scenario.

Z = (x - mean)/standard deviation

Now,

For x = 4171, Z = (4171 - 3311)/860 = 1

P(Z < 1) using Z table for areas for the standard normal distribution, you will get 0.8413.

Next, multiply that by the sample size of 732.

Therefore 732(0.8413) = 615.8316, so approximately 615 will weigh less than 4171

For part b, use the same method except x is now 1591.

Z = (1581 - 3311)/860 = -2

P(Z > -2) , using the Z table is 1 - 0.0228 = 0.9772 . Now 732(0.9772) = 715.3104, so approximately 715 will weigh more than 1591.

For part c, we now need to get two Z scores, one for 3311 and another for 5031.

Z1 = (3311 - 3311)/860 = 0

Z2 = (5031 - 3311)/860= 2

P(0 ≤ Z ≤ 2) = 0.9772 - 0.5000 = 0.4772

approximately 47% fall between 0 and 1 standard deviation, so take 0.47 times 732 ⇒ 732×0.47 = 344.

5 0

2 years ago

HELP PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

vazorg [7]

Answer:

-2/4, 8/40, 21/30, 9, 9 20/25

Step-by-step explanation:

9/20/25 is a bit greater than 9.

21/30 is 9 away from a whole 8/40 is 32 away from 40 -2/4 is way less because its on the negative side which is like so far away from the other numbers.

7 0

2 years ago