1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
RoseWind [281]
3 years ago
14

Cost $4 since 0.25•20=4. Together,they would cost Jada $6 , leaving her with $6 . 35 ounces of peanuts. If Jada wants 20 ounces

of raisins
Mathematics
1 answer:
Viefleur [7K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The Answer is....

Step-by-step explanation:

Need more info and question needs to be explained better

You might be interested in
A data mining routine has been applied to a transaction dataset and has classified 88 records as fraudulent (30 correctly so) an
chubhunter [2.5K]

Answer:

The classification matrix is attached below

Part a

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is 65.91%.

Part b

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is 96.64%

Step-by-step explanation:

The classification matrix is obtained as shown below:

The transaction dataset has 30 fraudulent correctly classified records out of 88 records, that is, 30 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is negative.

Also, there would be 88 - 30 = 58 non-fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 58 records are incorrectly predicted given that an instance is positive.

The transaction dataset has 920 non-fraudulent correctly classified records out of 952 records, that is, 920 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is positive.

Also, there would be 952 - 920 = 32 fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 32 records incorrectly predicted given that an instance is negative.

That is,

                                                                            Predicted value

                           Active value                 Fraudulent       Non-fraudulent

                              Fraudlent                         30                       58

                          non-fraudulent                   32                     920

The classification matrix is obtained by using the information related to the transaction data, which is classified into fraudulent records and non-fraudulent records.

The error rate is obtained as shown below:

The error rate is obtained by taking the ratio of \left( {b + c} \right)(b+c) and the total number of records.

The classification matrix is, shown above

The total number of records is, 30 + 58 + 32 + 920 = 1,040

The error rate is,

\begin{array}{c}\\{\rm{Error}}\,{\rm{rate}} = \frac{{b + c}}{{{\rm{Total}}}}\\\\ = \frac{{58 + 32}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = \frac{{90}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = 0.0865\\\end{array}  

The percentage is 0.0865 \times 100 = 8.65

(a)

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained by taking the rate ratio of b and \left( {a + b} \right)(a+b) .

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown above and in the attachment

The error rate for truly fraudulent is,

\begin{array}{c}\\FP = \frac{b}{{a + b}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{30 + 58}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{88}}\\\\ = 0.6591\\\end{array}  

The percentage is, 0.6591 \times 100 = 65.91

(b)

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained by taking the ratio of d and \left( {c + d} \right)(c+d) .

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown in the attachment

The error rate for truly non-fraudulent is,

\begin{array}{c}\\TP = \frac{d}{{c + d}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{32 + 920}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{952}}\\\\ = 0.9664\\\end{array}

The percentage is, 0.9664 \times 100 = 96.64

8 0
3 years ago
I dont understand this problem ​
zzz [600]

Answer:

<em>64 ; 8</em>

Step-by-step explanation:

a² ± 2ab + b² = (a ± b)²

x² + 2(8)(x) + 8² =

x² + 16x + <em>64</em> =

(x + <em>8</em>)²

4 0
3 years ago
If you answer this right I’ll give you brainliest
Yanka [14]
1/2 is the answer because if you look at the chart there are 5 flowers that are at least 60 inches and the other five are less then 60 inches so that makes your answer 1/2 because you reduce 5/10 to 1/2
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Given the arithmetic series 2 4 6...=420. find the first term a and the common difference d
Trava [24]
First term is 2 and the common difference is the value by which it increases which is 2.
7 0
3 years ago
On Saturday morning, Owen earned $23. By the end of the afternoon he had earned a total of $58. Enter an equation, using x as yo
Yuki888 [10]

Answer:

$23+x=$58

$23+$35=$58

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • How high up does the ladder reach
    9·1 answer
  • How do i solve this inequality and what is the answer? <br> solve for x: -3x +3 &lt; 6
    9·2 answers
  • A scale drawing of a rectangular painting has a scale factor of 1:4 which statements are true
    15·1 answer
  • Write a rule that express the number of quarts q of a liquid as a function of the number of the pints P
    7·2 answers
  • How many dots would be in the 50th figure?
    8·2 answers
  • Round 128,955 to the 8 place value
    13·2 answers
  • 3/125 ondalık gösterimi​
    13·1 answer
  • *EXTRA POINTS*
    6·1 answer
  • Someone pls answer #3 and 4<br> Will reward brainliest to the first most accurate answer ASAP.
    10·1 answer
  • Answer question in the picture
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!