<span>Because His B's were crooked.
This pun is based on the different meaning of the word 'straight'.
The first one means getting something in a row (scoring A in various subjects) , while the seconds meaning literally the shape that is not bended.</span>
The real reason for maintaining armies is the same reason why some men buy expensive sports cars... overcompensating.
Seriously, think of armies as insurance. Even if it's small, amateurish, and under-funded, it's likely to give potential bullies a little pause. (Of course, a big country like Iraq can sweep up a little country like Kuwait in no time flat, as we all know).
Part of the answer is social/ economic/ political inertia. The military is part of the playground for the elite and privileged. (I use the word playground as in "fork over your lunch money, weakling.") Who wants to get rid of their army just to balance the budget? I sure haven´t seen "fire soldier-boys" on any IMF or World Bank wish lists
A lot of countries, fragile democracies, say, find armies to be an effective tool to use on internal "problems." In a pinch, a loyal military can keep your nation away from chaos. On the other hand, they work equally well to keep dictators in power.
<span>Many countries do get a lot more mileage out of their armies than Iceland or Costa Rica could possibly get. Obviously, a lot of African countries find them pretty handy.
</span>
Also, keep this quote in mind
<span>"It takes two countries to maintain peace and only one to make war"</span>
The appropriate response is the second one. Verifiably, "objectivity" wound up noticeably important for daily papers and writers on the grounds that culpable the most modest number of individuals implied procuring the biggest benefit.
Answer:
The statement that best explains the meaning of "one person, one vote" is D. All people's votes should count equally.
Explanation:
The <em><u>One-Person, One-Vote Rule</u></em> -also called <em>one man, one vote</em>- is a principle that establishes a person's voting power should be equivalent to another person's within the same state, meaning no vote should carry more weight than other. Therefore, one could say the <em><u>One-Person, One-Vote Rule</u></em> is not only a slogan, but also the application of the principal of political equality.
Answer:
Explanation:
No, this is not true. An instigator is someone who “feeds the fire” or fuels the conflict and makes the problem worse. A pacifist is the opposite, someone who puts out the fire or lessens the comflict.
